Spending the night perusing my old answers, and this question left me wondering about the following.
Let's equip $\Bbb{R}^n$ with the usual Euclidean metric, and let us consider the map $N_t:\Bbb{R}^n\to \Bbb{R}$, $N_t(\vec{x})=||\vec{x}||^t$. The parameter $t$ is a positive constant, and the question I want to ask is:
For which pairs $(n,t)$ does there exist an unbounded path-connected set $S\subset \Bbb{R}^n$ such that the restriction $N_t\vert_S$ is uniformly continuous?
"Clearly" with $n=1$ we need $t\le1$. Path-connected + unbounded leaves no wiggle room for choice of $S$. The answers to the linked question give sets such that $N_2\vert_S$ is uniformly continuous, but those sets are not connected - hence this question.
With $n\ge2$ the game is more interesting. I'm thinking of a $S$ as a path slowly spiralling outwards. With $n=2$ something like $S$ = Archimedean spiral, with the distance from the origin growing at the constant rate of one unit per each full revolution, looks good for showing that all $t\le2$ are ok. Here the length of the path in the $n$th loop is about $2\pi n$ meaning that if $\vec{x}$ moves by $<\delta$ the distance from the origin will change by approximately a constant times $\delta/n$. In that case $N_2(\vec{x})$ will grow from $n^2$ to $(n+K\delta/n)^2\approx n^2+2K\delta$, which is ok, just barely, for the purposes of uniform continuity.
It doesn't look nearly as promising for $t>2$. If we are spiralling out any slower, then further out the distance between consecutive rounds of the spiral will tend to zero. Looks like that makes uniform continuity an unrealistic goal, and
The argument by user147263 from the comments under the question shows that the exponent $t$ cannot exceed the dimension of the ambient space.
I haven't really thought about $n\ge3$. We can use the extra wiggle room by spending more time at about the same distance, like "nearly cover" the sphere at radius $n$ while gradually moving on to the sphere of radius $n+1$ and repeating ever after. But I don't know any good 3D-spirals, not forgetting $n$D.
Any thoughts? Ideas? Suitable higher dimensional spirals? Known work?

For large $R$, the ball $B(0,R)$ contains over $R^{ t}/2$ points $x_k$. Since the balls $B(x_k,\delta/2)$ are disjoint, it follows that $R^n \ge (R^t/2) (\delta/2)^n$, which yields a contradiction when $R$ is large enough.
– Nov 02 '14 at 07:45