The quotient ring $\mathbb{Z}[x] / \langle (x^2 + 1)^2 \rangle$ was brought up in class today to contrast it with $\mathbb{Z}[x] / \langle x^2 + 1 \rangle$ after a discussion about adjoining elements to rings. That is, the second quotient ring given here is of course isomorphic to $\mathbb{Z}[i]$. We are adjoining $i$ to $\mathbb{Z}$ because $i$ satisfies $x^2 + 1 = 0$. However, $i$ also satisfies $(x^2 + 1)^2 = 0$. But surely $\mathbb{Z}[x] / \langle (x^2 + 1)^2 \rangle \not\cong \mathbb{Z}[x] / \langle x^2 + 1 \rangle$. So is $\mathbb{Z}[x] / \langle (x^2 + 1)^2 \rangle$ isomorphic to some familiar ring?
I've tried to think of some homomorphisms from $\mathbb{Z}[x]$ to other rings (e.g. $\mathbb{Z}[i] \times \mathbb{Z}[i]$) trying to get a kernel of $\langle (x^2 + 1)^2 \rangle$, but no luck. Intuitively, it seems like we are "adjoining $i$ twice", to get a sort of $4$ dimensional structure, as compared to $\mathbb{Z}[i]$ which is like a $2$ dimensional structure.
EDIT: A thought: perhaps the quotient is isomorphic to the Lipschitz quaternions? I can't seem to prove this claim.