2

Yesterday, while playing around with the GeoGebra application, I discovered a beautiful property of conic sections:

Theorem (Direct Statement)

Given: Let $H$ be a plane, and let $P$ be a conic section lying in $H$. Let $D$ be a line in $H$. Let $L_1$ and $L_2$ be tangents to $P$ at points $A$ and $B$, respectively, and suppose they intersect at point $C$. Let $T$ be a line parallel to $D$ and tangent to $P$ at a point $M$. Let $X = AM \cap D$, $Y = BM \cap D$, and $Z = CM \cap D$.

Claim: Point $Z$ is the midpoint of segment $XY$. enter image description here


Converse Statement

After further reflection, I realized that the converse of this theorem also seems to hold. It can be stated as follows:

Given: Let $H$ be a plane, and let $P$ be a conic section in $H$. Let $D$ be a line in $H$. Let $L_1$ and $L_2$ be tangents to $P$ at points $A$ and $B$, respectively, intersecting at point $C$. Let $T$ be a tangent to $P$ at point $M$ (not necessarily parallel to $D$). Let $X = AM \cap D$, $Y = BM \cap D$, and $Z = CM \cap D$, with the additional condition that $Z$ is the midpoint of segment $XY$.

Claim: Lines $T$ and $D$ are parallel.


My Questions:

Q1: How can we prove the direct theorem stated above?

Q2: Is this theorem known in the literature? If so, could you kindly provide a reference where it is mentioned?

Q3: This theorem implies that there are infinitely many points $M$ in $H$ satisfying the condition (since there are infinitely many conics through $A$ and $B$ with $L_1$ and $L_2$ as tangents). What is the locus of such points $M$ that preserve the midpoint condition for $Z$? Can this locus be constructed from the data of $A$, $B$, $C$, and the line $D$?


Note 1:

You may help me answer this question if you can suggest a method for constructing a conic tangent to two given lines at two known points and passing through a third known point (all in the same plane), using only ruler and compass. (By “constructing a conic with ruler and compass,” I mean: either constructing its key elements such as foci and vertices, or constructing two additional points on the conic — because I already know how to construct a conic through five points using classical tools. See my question and answer on this topic.)


Note 2:

I know how to construct a parabola tangent to two given lines at two given points, using the so-called Steiner generation of a parabola. Therefore, I can construct one point on the locus of $M$. However, I don’t know how to construct any of the other conics tangent to $L_1$ and $L_2$ at $A$ and $B$, respectively. If you can tell me how to construct such a conic, it would be extremely helpful.

  • 2
    The first language of زكريا حسناوي is not English, and according to his profile, he uses Google Translate to write questions are read answers. Short comments, which often lack context, may be harder to translate accurately. I, too, would like to see some responses. But what I really like is seeing زكريا حسناوي's great questions, and if that means no responses, I think it's a fair tradeoff. – John Hughes Jun 15 '25 at 19:52
  • John Hughes I appreciate your comment, but meanwhile my answer has even been downvoted... By whom ? – Jean Marie Jun 15 '25 at 19:55
  • I'm sorry I don't react much to comments and answers in general, I hope that I will process these answers in a timely manner, and if something I haven't addressed I don't put any positive/negative vote on it. – زكريا حسناوي Jun 15 '25 at 21:23
  • I have no idea Jean Marie. I liked it. But I also have posts that are 8 years old, accepted by the OP, and yet get a gratuitous downvote in 2025. Who knows why? Maybe in the case of your answer, someone was hoping for a Euclidean-level explanation rather than the abstraction of projective xforms. Anyhow, I notice that the downvote has now gone away. – John Hughes Jun 16 '25 at 19:07

2 Answers2

3

For the direct statement, with a bit of projective geometry:

Use an arbitrary projective transformation of the plane which sends the line $T$ to the line at infinity. Notice that the point of $D$ which is at infinity is the intersection of $D$ and $T$, so it remains at infinity after the transformation. This means that the transformation of $D$ is actually affine, so $Z$ will be in the middle of $XY$ after the transformation iff it was in the middle before.

The transformation sends the conic to a parabola, say to $y = x^2$, and the lines passing through $M$ are now (transformed to) vertical lines. We can still use an affine transformation of the plane, preserving our parabola $y=x^2$, to move $C$ to the $y$-axis. Then, by symmetry, $A = (x, x^2)$ and $B = (-x, x^2)$ for a suitable $x$, and so the 3 vertical lines passing through $A, C, B$ are equidistant, hence any line, in particular $D$, will intersect them in points $X, Z, Y$ s.t. $Z$ is in the middle of $XY$.

Edit: How to get the promised affine transformation of the plane moving $C$ to the $y$ axis: For any number $a$ the affine transformation of the plane $(x, y)\mapsto (x + a, y + 2ax + a^2)$ preserves the parabola $y = x^2$. We simply choose $a$ so that the $x$-coordinate of $C$ becomes $0$.

user8268
  • 22,450
1

The method used by user8268 is good. Indeed, we can send $M$ to infinity, making the conic curve a parabola.

We use for that a certain projective transform making lines $AX, BY, CZ$ parallel and line $D$, being parallel to the tangent at infinity, orthogonal to those 3 lines, a parallel to the directrix ; besides, as the point at infinity $P_{\infty}$ of line $D$ remains fixed, so the cross-ratio $(P_{\infty},Z;Y,X)$ is also fixed ; if it is $-1$ before, in the case of a midpoint, it will remain $-1$ after the transformation.

Here is a proof differing from the previous one by the fact that we don't use the assumption that $A$ and $B$ have to be symmetrical with respect to the axis of the parabola.

Indeed, consider that this transformed parabola has, with respect to "ad hoc" axis the

  • cartesian equation

$$y=\tfrac{1}{4a}x^2\tag{1}$$

  • or (equivalent) parametric equations

$$P_t=(x=2at, y=at^2)\tag{2}$$

A small calculation shows that tangent lines to parabola in $A=P_{t_1}$ and $B=P_{t_2}$ meet in point $C$ with coordinates :

$$C=(a(t_1+t_2),at_1t_2)\tag{3}$$

(sanity check : consider the limit case $t_1=t_2=t$ in (3), one retrieves (2).)

Now take $a=\tfrac12$ : $C$ (and therefore $Z$) has abscissa $\tfrac12(t_1+t_2)$ with points $A=P_{t_1}$ and $B=P_{t_2}$ with resp. abscissas $t_1,t_2$ (which are also the abscissas of $X$ and $Y$ resp.)

Finished.

Jean Marie
  • 88,997
  • 1
    I added the missing detail to my answer, though it needed one more formula :) – user8268 Jun 16 '25 at 17:33
  • Good ! (I already upvoted your answer). I have, on my side, also added a missing detail, the fact that the midpoint remains a midpoint which had to be established ! – Jean Marie Jun 16 '25 at 19:28