Sorry if this is a stupid question, but I have been staring at this for too long and can't figure it out. This is from page 3 of "Stochastic Processes" by Sheldon Ross in the proof of the Borel-Cantelli Lemma. In the proof the "limit supremum" of a sequence of events (not necessarily increasing or decreasing) is defined as:
My question is: how is this event not equal to the empty set? The way I am looking at it: For each n, if k < n, then A_k is not in that union. Therefore if A_k is not in at least one of these unions, it's not in the intersection. Now, for every possible natural number k you can think of, there exists another number n > k. Therefore there exists a union which does not contain k, for each number k. Therefore none of the A_k are in this set. But according to the book this event is supposed to represent an infinite number of A_k occurring.
Where did my logic go wrong? Any help would be much appreciated!
