So I was looking through my questions for a sense of nostalgia when I came across this question of mine asking on how to evaluate $$\int_{-\infty}^\infty\Gamma(1+ix)\Gamma(1-ix)dx$$Now here's the thing: Here is a few steps that I took that I'm not really sure I understand:
$$\int_{-\infty}^\infty(ix)!(-ix)!dx$$$$\text{Which can be rewritten as }\int_{-\infty}^\infty ix\Gamma(ix)\Gamma(1-ix)dx$$$$\text{Which can then be simplified as }\int_{-\infty}^\infty ix\pi\csc(\pi ix)dx$$
Although here's the thing: why does any $\Gamma(z)\Gamma(1-z)$ simplify to $\pi\csc(\pi z)$? And when writing this question, I came across this question:
I'm reading on the extension of $\Gamma$ to the complex plane and there is written:
Corollary$$\Gamma(z)\ne0\qquad\forall z\in\mathbb{C}\setminus\{0,-1,-2,\dots\}$$
Proof
$(\forall z\in\mathbb{C}\setminus\mathbb{Z})\quad\Gamma(1-z)\Gamma(z)=\dfrac\pi{\sin(\pi z)}$ implies this. For $n\in\mathbb{N}$ is $\Gamma(n+1)=n!\ne0$
Why?
Can someone explain why this is true? Why does $\Gamma(1-z)\Gamma(z)=\dfrac\pi{\sin(\pi z)}$ imply $\Gamma(z)\ne0$?
As it turns out, it is because the RHS is a nonzero, so the LHS cannot be also. But that doesn't really answer my question.
My question
Why does $\Gamma(1-z)\Gamma(z)\gets\dfrac\pi{\sin(\pi z)}\implies\Gamma(z)\ne0$?