1

In this post: Trivial Orthogonal Complement $\implies$ Denseness! the relationship between trivial orthogonal complement and density of a subspace is investigated. The accepted answer: https://math.stackexchange.com/a/831907/877219 shows that trivial orthogonal complement does not imply density of the subspace. Namely, we take $X = C_0^\infty(\mathbb{R}), \hat{X} = L^2(\mathbb{R}), A = \{f\in X\mid \int_a^bf(x)dx = 0\}$. Then the accepted answer states that:

$A^\perp = \{0\}$ since $1_{[a,b]}\not\in X$, but $A$ is clearly not dense.

I don't quite understand why this shows that $A^\perp = \{0\}$. Could you explain to me in detail the gist of this proof?

Wasradin
  • 1,619

1 Answers1

3

The idea is that $A$ is the orthogonal complement of the indicator function ${\bf 1}_{[a,b]}$ of $[a,b]$, so $A^\perp$ is the span of ${\bf 1}_{[a,b]}$. But the latter intersects $X$ only in the zero function because ${\bf 1}_{[a,b]}$ is not smooth (continuous).

The details read as follows: Let $X:=(C_0^\infty(\mathbb R),\langle\cdot,\cdot\rangle_{L^2})$ and $A:=\{g\in X:\int_a^bg(x)dx=0\}$. Note that $A$ can be re-written as \begin{align*} A&=\Big\{g\in X:\int_{\mathbb R}{\bf 1}_{[a,b]}g(x)dx=0\Big\}\\ &=\{g\in X:\langle{\bf 1}_{[a,b]},g\rangle_{L^2}=0\}\\ &=\{g\in L^2(\mathbb R):\langle{\bf 1}_{[a,b]},g\rangle_{L^2}=0\}\cap X=\{{\bf 1}_{[a,b]}\}^{\perp,L^2}\cap X\,. \end{align*} where $(\cdot)^{\perp,L^2}$ is the orthogonal complement in $\bf L^2$.

Now we want to show that the orthogonal complement of $A$ in $\bf X$ (i.e. $A^\perp=A^{\perp,L^2}\cap X$) is just the zero function. For this we need the following facts (in this order):

With these tools at hand we compute \begin{align*} A^\perp=A^{\perp,L^2}\cap X&=(\{{\bf 1}_{[a,b]}\}^{\perp,L^2}\cap X)^{\perp,L^2}\cap X\\ &=\big(\overline{\{{\bf 1}_{[a,b]}\}^{\perp,L^2}\cap X}\big)^{\perp,L^2}\cap X\\ &=(\{{\bf 1}_{[a,b]}\}^{\perp,L^2})^{\perp,L^2}\cap X\\ &=\operatorname{span}({\bf 1}_{[a,b]})\cap X=\{0\} \end{align*} so altogether $A^\perp=\{0\}$. The last step is where we used that ${\bf 1}_{[a,b]}\not\in X$.

Frederik vom Ende
  • 5,187
  • 1
  • 11
  • 39
  • @Frederick vom Ende : Does your answer contradict the answer to the fourth question on page 15 of the document at this link below. I didn't understand it but maybe it's not correct. Thank you for any clarification. It's much appreciated. https://math.uchicago.edu/~may/REU2021/REUPapers/Adler.pdf – mark leeds Oct 13 '23 at 17:04
  • In Hilbert spaces—that is, complete inner product spaces—a subspace being dense is equivalent to its orthogonal complement being zero; this is what is written in the document you linked, and this is a correct statement. The point of this question was to clarify to which extent completeness is necessary for this to hold. The example given above shows that in general (i.e. non-complete) inner product spaces—such as $C_0^\infty(\mathbb R)$—subspaces can have trivial orthogonal complement without being dense. – Frederik vom Ende Oct 14 '23 at 00:52
  • 1
    aaaah. okay. I get it now ( not the adler proof but the lack of contradiction ). It's much appreciated. You explained your Feb 19 answer so beautifully that even I could follow it. Thank you. – mark leeds Oct 14 '23 at 01:44