I'm studying the book Linear Algebra by Hoffman and Kunze and on page 211 they state the following observation about projections:
Projections can be used to describe direct-sum decompositions of the space V. For, suppose $V=W_1\oplus\ldots \oplus W_k$. For each $j$ we shall define an operator $E_j$ on $V$. Let $\alpha$ be in $V$, say $\alpha = \alpha_1+\ldots+\alpha_k$ with $\alpha_i$ in $W_i$. Define $E_j\alpha=\alpha_j$. Then $E_j$ is a well-defined rule. It is easy to see that $E_j$ is linear, that the range of $E_j$ is $W_j$, and that $E_j^2=E_j$. The null space of $E_j$ is the subspace
$$(W_1+\ldots+W_{j-1}+W_{j+1}+\ldots +W_k)$$
I didn't understand the last line, why $(W_1+\ldots+W_{j-1}+W_{j+1}+\ldots +W_k)$? shouldn't be $$(W_1\oplus\ldots\oplus W_{j-1}\oplus W_{j+1}\oplus\ldots \oplus W_k)$$
EDIT
The user @Semiclassical pointed out a possible typo in the book, but the link provided doesn't have any relationship with the statements of my question. Besides that, the page is also different.