Some problem I've found while thinking about duals of vector spaces:
Be $S$ an arbitrary set. Denote by $F(S)$ the set of finite subsets of $S$, and by $P(S)$ its power set.
Now it is easy to see that $F(S)$ forms a vector space over $\mathbb{Z}/2\mathbb{Z}$ if you define vector addition as symmetric difference and multiplication with scalar by the simple relations $0A=\emptyset$ and $1A=A$. A particular basis of that vector space is $\{\{s\}: s\in S\}$.
From that, it is also easy to construct the dual space $F(S)^*$: Its members are simply given by the elements of $P(S)$ with the following application rule: If $\alpha\in P(S)$ and $v\in F(S)$, then $$\alpha(v) = \begin{cases}1 & \text{if $\alpha\cap v$ has an odd number of elements}\\0 & \text{if $\alpha\cap v$ has an even number of elements}\end{cases}$$ (or simply, express the number of elements in $\alpha\cup v$ in $\mathbb{Z}/2\mathbb{Z}$. It is also not hard to show that vector addition in $F(S)^*$ is again the symmetric difference. So one can say that, given the application rule above, $F(S)^* = P(S)$ Note that for finite $S$, $F(S)=P(S)$, while for infinite $S$, $F(S)$ is smaller than $P(S)$.
So far, so good. However, what about the double-dual $F(S)^{**} = P(S)^*$? Since for finite $S$, $P(S)=F(S)$, one would conclude that the very same construction works again. However for infinite $S$, it cannot work, because you cannot say whether an infinite set has an even or odd number of elements. Also, $P(S)$ already contains all subsets of $S$, and as far as I understand, $P(S)^*$ should then be larger than $P(S)$.
Therefore my question: Does there exist a simple representation of $F(S)^{**}=P(S)^*$, and if so, what does it look like? Ideally one should easily see the equivalence to $F(S)$ in the case of finite $S$.
\textis an amsmath macro. As far as I know, without amsmath the only easy way to locally enter text mode in math is via\mbox. Therefore anybody who has done a lot of $\text{LaTeX}$ before learning about the amsmath commands (as I did) will have developed the habit of using\mboxhere (as well as some other hard to change habits, like usingeqnarrayinstead ofalign). – celtschk Jul 07 '12 at 23:08\mboxdoesn't have that effect? (Note that\mboxdoes also reset the font size, so you cannot use it in subscripts without creating ugly effects, but that just means you wouldn't use it e.g. in indices). – celtschk Jul 07 '12 at 23:55