It is impossible for maven to work without defining versions of the
artifacts , so somewhere it must be mentioned, lets dig in part by
part.
All pom.xmls are logically inherit from the super POM. You can always see what your "real" pom.xml looks like by typing:
mvn help:effective-pom
The resulting pom.xml that is printed is a combination of the super POM, your pom.xml, and any parent POMs in the mix as well.
Note from Maven 3 the super POM does not contain any of the (default lifecycle) plugins versions but earlier till Maven 2 it used to have.
The Maven 3 super POM is provided by the org.apache.maven.model.superpom.DefaultSuperPomProvider class https://github.com/apache/maven/blob/bce33aa2662a51d18cb00347cf2fb174dc195fb1/maven-model-builder/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/model/superpom/DefaultSuperPomProvider.java#L56-L85
The resource it loads can be found here: https://github.com/apache/maven/blob/bce33aa2662a51d18cb00347cf2fb174dc195fb1/maven-model-builder/src/main/resources/org/apache/maven/model/pom-4.0.0.xml#L23-L149
Edit:
As per Maven Coordinates
groupId:artifactId:version are all required fields (although,
groupId and version need not be explicitly defined if they are
inherited from a parent - more on inheritance later). The three fields
act much like an address and timestamp in one. This marks a specific
place in a repository, acting like a coordinate system for Maven
projects:
version: This is the last piece of the naming puzzle. groupId:artifactId denotes a single project but they cannot delineate which incarnation of that project we are talking about. Do we want the junit:junit of 2018 (version 4.12), or of 2007 (version 3.8.2)? In short: code changes, those changes should be versioned, and this element keeps those versions in line. It is also used within an artifact's repository to separate versions from each other. my-project version 1.0 files live in the directory structure $M2_REPO/org/codehaus/mojo/my-project/1.0.