9

Are there nonconstant real-analytic functions $f(z)$ such that

$$ f(z)=f\left(\sqrt z\right) + f\left(-\sqrt z\right)$$

is satisfied near the real line?

Also can such functions be entire? And/Or can they be periodic with a real period $p>0$?

Does the set of equations

$$ f(z)=f\left(\sqrt z\right) + f\left(-\sqrt z\right)$$

$$ f(z)=f(z+p)$$

$$ f ' (0) > 0$$

imply that $f(z)= 0 + a_1 z + a_2 z^2 + a_3 z^3 + \dots$, where more than $50\%$ of the nonzero signs of the $a_n$ are positive?

Related:

Real-analytic periodic $f(z)$ that has more than 50 % of the derivatives positive?

mick
  • 17,886

4 Answers4

7

As pointed out by Zarrax, $$ f(z^2)=f(z)+f(-z)\tag{1} $$ implies $$ \sum_{k=0}^\infty a_kz^{2k}=2\sum_{k=0}^\infty a_{2k}z^{2k}\tag{2} $$ therefore, $$ a_k=2a_{2k}\tag{3} $$ Obviously, $a_0=0$. Given $a_k$ for odd $k$, $(3)$ allows us to compute all $a_k$.

Functions with power series that satisfy $(3)$ are $$ \begin{align} f_n(z) &=-\log(1-z^{2n+1})\\[6pt] &=\sum_{k=1}^\infty\frac{z^{k(2n+1)}}{k}\tag{4} \end{align} $$ and linear combinations of the $f_n$. Note that the $f_n$ satisfy $(1)$. In fact, $$ \begin{align} \sum_{n=0}^\infty\frac{\mu(2n+1)}{2n+1}f_n(z) &=\sum_{n=0}^\infty\sum_{k=1}^\infty\frac{\mu(2n+1)}{2n+1}\frac{z^{k(2n+1)}}{k}\\[9pt] &=\sum_{n=1}^\infty\sum_{\substack{d\mid n\\d\text{ odd}}}\mu(d)\frac{z^n}{n}\\ &=\sum_{n=0}^\infty\frac{z^{2^n}}{2^n}\tag{5} \end{align} $$ where $\mu$ is the Möbius function. The last equation in $(5)$ follows from $$ \sum_{\substack{d\mid n\\d\text{ odd}}}\mu(d) =\left\{\begin{array}{} 1&\text{if $n$ is a power of $2$}\\ 0&\text{otherwise} \end{array}\right.\tag{6} $$ We can use $$ \begin{align} f_n\left(z^{2k+1}\right) &=-\log\left(1-z^{(2k+1)(2n+1)}\right)\\ &=f_{2kn+k+n}(z)\tag{7} \end{align} $$ to write all possible functions satisfying $(1)$ as linear combinations of the $f_n$. That is, use $(5)$ then $(7)$ to get $$ \begin{align} \sum_{k=0}^\infty\sum_{n=0}^\infty a_{2k+1}\frac{z^{(2k+1)2^n}}{2^n} &=\sum_{k=0}^\infty\sum_{n=0}^\infty a_{2k+1}\frac{\mu(2n+1)}{2n+1}f_n\left(z^{2k+1}\right)\\ &=\sum_{k=0}^\infty\sum_{n=0}^\infty a_{2k+1}\frac{\mu(2n+1)}{2n+1}f_{2kn+k+n}(z)\tag{8} \end{align} $$ Therefore, all $f$ that satisfy $(1)$ are given by linear combinations of the $f_n$.


For example, we can write the example given by mjqxxxx as $$ \log(1+z+z^2)=f_0(z)-f_1(z) $$

robjohn
  • 353,833
4

The simplest example of such a function that is real-analytic over the entire real line is $$ f(z)=\log\left(1+z+z^2\right). $$ We have $$ f(\sqrt{z})+f(-\sqrt{z})=\log\left(1+\sqrt{z}+z\right)+\log\left(1-\sqrt{z}+z\right)\\=\log\left((1+z)^2-z\right)\\=\log\left(1+z+z^2\right)\\=f(z), $$ as desired. It's not entire, but is analytic in the neighborhood of the real line, since its branch cuts start at $z=-1/2\pm i\sqrt{3}/2$.

mjqxxxx
  • 43,344
1

Write $f(z) = \sum_n a_nz^n$ as a power series near $z = 0$. Then the equation $f(z^2) = f(z) + f(-z)$ implies that $$\sum_{n = 0}^{\infty} a_n z^{2n} = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} a_nz^n + a_n (-z)^n$$ $$= \sum_{n \, even} 2a_n z^n$$ $$= \sum_{n = 0}^{\infty} 2a_{2n} z^{2n}$$ So you have to have $a_{2n} = {1 \over 2}a_n$ for all $n$. Conversely if this holds for all $n$ then the power series for $f(z)$ will satisfy $f(z^2) = f(z) + f(-z)$. So the desired equation $f(z) = f(\sqrt{z}) + f(-\sqrt{z})$ will hold for $z \geq 0$. So for example ${\displaystyle \sum_{k = 0}^{\infty} {z^{2^k} \over 2^k}}$ works. None of these functions can be made entire... if $a_n \neq 0$ then ${\displaystyle \sum_{k=0}^{\infty} a_{2^{k}n}z^{2^{k}n} = \sum_{k=0}^{\infty} a_{n}{z^{2^{k}n} \over 2^k}} $ diverges for $z > 1$.

I'm not sure what $f(z) = f(\sqrt{z}) + f(-\sqrt{z})$ is supposed to mean when $z$ is not a nonnegative real number. But if you fix a definition for $\sqrt{z}$ these functions will satisfy $f(z) = f(\sqrt{z}) + f(-\sqrt{z})$ too.

Zarrax
  • 46,591
  • Im not yet convinced by the idea that the function cannot be made entire. What about negative signs ? Also : Can the function have a real period ? – mick Jun 20 '14 at 18:49
  • Hmm it seems the radius is 1 , so not entire. But maybe periodic after analytic continuation ? – mick Jun 20 '14 at 18:53
1

Note that if $f(z)$ is an odd function $f(-z) = -f(z)$, then we obtain

$$ f(z) = f(\sqrt{z}) + f(-\sqrt{z}) = f(\sqrt{z}) - f(\sqrt{z}) = 0 $$

Note that if $f(z)$ is an even function $f(-z) = f(z)$, then we obtain

$$ f(z) = f(\sqrt{z}) + f(-\sqrt{z}) = f(\sqrt{z}) + f(\sqrt{z}) = 2 f(\sqrt{z}) $$

So we look for a even function such that

$$ f(z^2) = 2 f(z) $$

or more general

$$ f(z^n) = n f(z) $$

The function

$$ \ln(|z|^k) $$

has this property, so

$$ f(z) = \ln\Big(|z|^k\Big) $$


Note that

$$ f\big(\pm\sqrt{-z}\big) = \ln\Big(\big|\pm\sqrt{-z}\big|^k\Big) = \ln\Big(\sqrt{|z|}^k\Big) $$

and is well defined.

  • Im sorry but $f(z)=0$ is ruled out by the OP : a nonconstant function. Also $\ln(|x|)$ is invalid : it is not real-analytic. A logaritm is not analytic at 0. Im aware of these ideas but they are too trivial and do not give an answer to the OP. – mick Jun 20 '14 at 18:41
  • That is why $f(z)$ is excluded and therefore $f(z)$ MUST be an even function. That is why you can only have even powers, thus $x^2k$ or powers of $|x|$.

    And $\ln(|x|)$ is real analytic - it can local be written as a power serie.

    – johannesvalks Jun 20 '14 at 21:34
  • But $f(-z)$ can only be defined IF $f(z)$ contains $|z|$ in the function, thus $f(z) = g(|z|)$. – johannesvalks Jun 20 '14 at 21:47
  • $ln(|x|)$ is not analytic at $x=0$, it does not even converge there !? – mick Jun 22 '14 at 20:34
  • The condition

    $$f(z) = f(\sqrt{z}) + f(-\sqrt{z})$$

    can never be defined on $\texttt{R}$, unless we include $|z|$.

    For negative values, you obtain

    $$f(-z) = f(\sqrt{-z}) + f(-\sqrt{-z})$$

    So this can only become 'real' IF

    $$f(z) = g(|z|)$$

    meaning that it is not analytical at $0$.

    – johannesvalks Jun 22 '14 at 21:04
  • @mick:

    From the condition follows that

    $$ f(z^k) = k f(z) $$

    Therefore

    $$ f(0) = \lim_{k \rightarrow \infty} k f(z), 0 < z < 1$$

    So $f(0) \rightarrow \pm \infty$, meaning that it is simply not analytic there...

    – johannesvalks Jun 22 '14 at 21:11
  • NO , the sum of 2 complex numbers can be real, so no log like equations or absolute value equations follow from that , and still log(|x|) does not even converge for x = 0. Adding variables does not change that. – mick Jun 22 '14 at 21:20
  • @Mick

    The function $f(z)$ how you define it is not defined for $0$ as it goes to infinity.

    Just consider

    $$ f(0.1) $$

    Then you get

    $$ f(0.01) = 2 f(0.1) $$

    $$ f(0.001) = 3 f(0.1) $$

    $$ f(0.0001) = 4 f(0.1) $$

    $$ f(0.00001) = 5 f(0.1) $$

    $$ f(0.000000000000000000000\cdots) = \textrm{'}\infty f(0.1)\textrm{'} $$

    – johannesvalks Jun 22 '14 at 21:23
  • Sorry but Zarrax , who gave the other answer did give a solution that was defined at $0$. SO it seems only your log is not defined there. AND THUS I said it was not analytic there since it did not even converge. See ? – mick Jun 22 '14 at 21:39
  • @mick, just read it all. The function $f(z)$ is not defined at $0$ - so you cannot write it as a serie around $0$. – johannesvalks Jun 22 '14 at 21:44
  • Sorry but Zarrax solution is defined at 0. It has a radius of 1. In fact he ACTUALLY gave a series around 0 contrary to what you claim. – mick Jun 22 '14 at 21:46
  • @mick, just read it all. The function $f(z)$ is not defined at $0$ - so you cannot write it as a serie around $0$. – johannesvalks Jun 22 '14 at 21:49
  • I give up. You just said the exact same thing. – mick Jun 22 '14 at 21:50
  • @mick, the series that Zarrax wrote is based on an assumption. But it is wrong.

    As

    $$ a_n = 2 a_{2n} $$

    you get

    $$ a_0 = 0 $$

    When you come to the conclusion that the $n$ can only be even you get

    $$ f(\pm z) = a_0 + a_2 z^2 + a_4 z^4 + \cdots $$

    $$ f(z^2) = a_0 + a_2 z^4 + a_4 z^8 + \cdots $$

    So $a_2 = 0$, and thus $a_4 = 0$, $a_8 = 0$ and so on.

    When you work it out, the serie yiels $a_n = 0$ for all $n$, i.e. $f(z) = 0$.

    The serie around $0$ does not work.

    – johannesvalks Jun 22 '14 at 22:02
  • The point is that a function $f(z)$ such that

    $$ f(z^2) = k f(z) $$

    can never be expressed around $z=0$, for the lowest power

    $$ z^k $$

    on the right side is never contained on the left side.

    – johannesvalks Jun 22 '14 at 22:08
  • Hmm ok , but Your talking about function that need to be even or odd. What if $f(z)$ is neither ? – mick Jun 22 '14 at 22:24
  • Considering the condition you might consider another way to write $f(z)$

    $$f(z) = a \sum_{k=-\infty}^{+\infty} 2^{-k} z^{2^k}$$

    But this kind of sums is difficult and I wonder if there is any value for $z$ that this sum converges...

    – johannesvalks Jun 22 '14 at 22:37
  • 1
    If $f(z)$ is not even nor odd, we can always write

    $$ f(z) = f_\textrm{even} (z) + f_\textrm{odd}(z)$$

    where

    $$ f_\textrm{even} (z) = \frac{f(z) + f(-z) }{2} $$

    and

    $$ f_\textrm{odd} (z) = \frac{f(z) - f(-z) }{2} $$

    The same properties hold and from that

    $$ f_\textrm{odd} (z) = 0 $$

    whence $f(z)$ can only be even.

    – johannesvalks Jun 22 '14 at 22:39
  • Another way to see why you cannot write $f(z)$ around zero is that

    $$ f(z) = f(\sqrt{z}) + f(-\sqrt{z})$$

    But as you cannot write $\sqrt{z}$ as a serie around $0$ you cannot write $f(z)$ as a serie around $0$.

    – johannesvalks Jun 22 '14 at 23:13
  • @johannesvalks You have to fix a definition of $\sqrt{z}$ for $z$ that isn't nonnegative, but once you do these power series do work. And obviously $\ln |z|$ is not real-analytic (and blows up as $z \rightarrow 0$, so there's no reason to even discuss it). Your comments have numerous errors, please stop with this. – Zarrax Jun 23 '14 at 00:50
  • @Zarrax and mick - you are correct! – johannesvalks Jun 23 '14 at 11:41