While reading the Gortz's Wedhorn's Algebraic Geometry, proof of Theorem 13.89, I encountered next situation : Let $C\subsetneq \mathbb{P}^{m}_k$ - the notation $\mathbb{P}^m_k$ means the projective space regarded as a scheme - be a proper closed subscheme of a projective space over an 'infinite' field $k$. Then does there exists a $k$-valued point $q\in \mathbb{P}^{m}(k)$ - the notation $\mathbb{P}^{m}(k)$ means the projective space regarded as a classical variety - which is not contained in $C$ ( because there exists no nonzero homogeneous polynomial that vanishes on all points of $\mathbb{P}^{m}(k)$ ? )? Can we try to use the nonexistence of such homogeneous polynomial? If all $k$-valued points are contained in $C$, then such homogeneous polynomial exists? If our question is not true in general, how about the case that $C:=\operatorname{Im}(f)$, where $f: X \to \mathbb{P}^{m}_k$ is an nonsurjective closed immersion ? Since $C$ is proper subset, we can choose an element in $\mathbb{P}^{m}_k - C$ but I don't know how to choose it as a k-valued point.
EDIT : Consider next situation. Let $\mathbb{P}^{m}(k)$ be a projective space over infinite field $k$, which is considered as the classical variety. Let $C \subsetneq \mathbb{P}^{m}(k)$ be a proper ( Zariski ) closed subset. Then $C$ is of the form $V_{+}(f_1, \dots , f_r)$ for some homogeneous polynomials $f_1, \dots ,f_r \in k[X_0, \dots , X_m]$.
Interlude question : In this setting, the $k$-valued point of $\mathbb{P}^{m}(k)$ means just a point whose homogeneous coordinates are elements of the field $k$ ?
Assume this question is true. Since $C= V_{+}(f_1, \dots, f_r)$ is a proper subset, we assume that all $f_i$ are nonzero. By the bold statement in our question - there exists no nonzero homogeneous polynomial that vanishes on all points of $\mathbb{P}^{m}(k)$ since $k$ is infinite - , for each $1 \le i \le r$, there exists $q_i \in \mathbb{P}^{m}(k)$ such that $f_i(q_i) \neq 0$. In particular, $f_1(q_1) \neq 0$ so that $q_1 \notin C$. So if the interlude question is true, then $q_1$ is $k$-valued point ( True? I do not completely convince for this part ). So I think we find such $q \in \mathbb{P}^{m}(k)$ as in the above bold statement.
But let's consider different direction. If the interlude question is true, then since $C$ is proper subset any $q\in \mathbb{P}^{m}(k)-C$ satisfies such condition in the bold statement? But why Gortz, Wedhorn did not argue directly as this? In this second argument, it seems that the condtion that $k$ is infinte is redundant but I think we should use the infinity of $k$. Where the infiniteness of $k$ is used exactly? Is there a problem in the above interlude question? Is there a point that I missing something? I'm a little bit confused. Can anyone please clarify this issue a bit more?