9

I'm studying functional analysis and I ask this question mainly because I want a feedback on my proof and suggestions to formalize better my argument (if not already well formalized); any other hint to work on this kind of problem in a better way is well accepted and desired.

The exercise I was facing is the following:

Let $T$ be the operator $$T \colon C^0([0,1],\mathbb{R},||\cdot||_{\infty}) \to C^0([0,1],\mathbb{R},||\cdot||_{\infty})$$ defined by, $\forall u \in C^0([0,1],\mathbb{R})$ (which from now on I'll denote by $X$), $$(Tu)(x) := \int_0^x \sqrt t \cdot u(t)dt.$$ Prove that the operator is compact and compute the point spectrum $\sigma_p(T)$ and the full spectrum $\sigma(T)$.

I'll write now my solution divided in parts.

  1. $T$ is linear. The proof is obvious.
  2. $T$ is continuous. To prove this, since it's linear and $(C^0([0,1],\mathbb{R},||\cdot||_{\infty})$ is a Banach space, I just need to prove that it's bounded. For any $x \in X$ we have:

$$|Tu(x)| = \left| \int_0^x \sqrt t \cdot u(t)dt \right|\leq \int_0^1 |\sqrt t \cdot u(t)dt| \leq ||u||_{\infty}\int_0^1 \sqrt t dt = \frac{2}{3}||u||_{\infty} < \infty$$ where the second inequality follows from Cauchy-Schwarz and the last one follows from the fact that $u$ is bounded since it's continuous on a compact interval. By taking the supremum we have $$||Tu||_{\infty} = \sup_{x \in X}|Tu(x)| \leq \frac{2}{3} ||u||_{\infty}$$ and so the operator is bounded and hence continuous.

  1. We want now to prove that T is compact i.e. for every bounded sequence $(u_n)_n$, $||u_n||_{\infty} \leq M$ for some $M > 0$ and $\forall n \in \mathbb{N}$, the image $(Tu_n)_n$ has a convergent subsequence. By using Ascoli-Arzelà theorem this is the same as proving $(Tu_n)_n$ is uniformly equicontinuous and uniformly bounded. Now, $\forall x \in [0,1]$, $$|(Tu_n)(x)| \leq \int_0^1 |\sqrt t| \cdot |u(t)| dt \leq \frac{2}{3}M$$ and by taking the supremum we have $$||Tu_n||_{\infty} \leq \frac{2}{3}M$$ and so $(Tu_n)$ is uniformly bounded. Let's now prove it's uniformly equicontinuous. We know $\sqrt t$ is continuous in $X$ since it's constant with respect to the variable $x$. Let $\delta$ such that $|x - \tilde{x}| < \delta $. We have: $$|(Tu_n)(x) - (Tu_n)(\tilde{x})| = \left| \int_x^{\tilde{x}} \sqrt t \cdot u(t)dt \right| \leq M \cdot \delta$$ and so by taking $\delta = \frac{\epsilon}{M}$ we have the uniform equicontinuity.

  2. Since $T$ is compact we have $\sigma(T) = \sigma_p(T) \cup \{0\}$. Let $\lambda \in \sigma_p(T)$ an eigenvalue with eigenvector $u$. Then: $$(Tu)(x) = \int_0^x \sqrt t \cdot u(t) dt = \lambda u(x)$$ and differentiating both sides we obtain $$\sqrt x \cdot u(x) = \lambda u'(x)$$ with $u(0)=0$. The Cauchy's problem: \begin{equation} \left\{\begin{aligned} u'(x) &= \frac{\sqrt x \cdot u(x)}{\lambda} \\ u(0) &= 0 \end{aligned} \right. \end{equation} has $u \equiv 0$ as the only solution for Gronwall's Lemma since $\int_0^1 \frac{\sqrt x}{\lambda}$ is finite. In conclusion we have $\sigma_p(T) = \emptyset$ and so $\sigma(T) = \{0\}$.

So, here it was my proof. I'll tell you quickly where I suspect I may have done something imperfect and that's why I'm here to ask.

  1. Chosing $\delta$ as I needed was fair? Or do I need to do something else to prove the equicontinuity?
  2. Is using Gronwall's Lemma for the computation of the eigenvalue like shooting with a cannon to a fly? Is there a simpler method I should use in a first course of functional analysis without calling to differential equations?

I thank in advance any of you willing to help me correct/confirm this proof and clear my mind from doubts.

  • 1
    Looks pretty good to me. I can't think of any simpler solution to 2. than Gronwall's inequality. – K.defaoite Jun 22 '25 at 23:15
  • 2
    btw, do not be afraid to "invoke" ODE theory to solve functional analysis questions. In fact, a very huge chunk of functional analysis was developed to solve/understand ODEs (and integral equations and PDEs). So, it's not at all surprising if you need to invoke some ODE knowledge to get some other ODE/integral equation/PDE knowledge. – peek-a-boo Jun 23 '25 at 04:09
  • You can "standardize" the argument by factorizing the operator. The integral operator as linear map $C^0\to C^1$ is continuous and the identity embedding $C^1\to C^0$ is compact (by essentially the same argument using Arzela-Ascoli). The composition is then again (trivially) compact. – Lutz Lehmann Jun 23 '25 at 18:08

2 Answers2

4
  1. Well, I guess you also have to prove $T$ is well-defined, i.e. $T(u)$ is continuous, though also trivial (actually overdone when proving $T(u_n)$ are uniformly equicontinuous in the next.)

  2. There is a typo $|\sqrt{t}\cdot u(t)dt|$ should be $|\sqrt{t} \cdot u(t)|dt$. The second inequality is not Cauchy-Schwartz, but simply $f\le g\Rightarrow \int f \le \int g$.

  3. Don't repeat the computation in the last step. $\|T(u_n)\|\le \|T\|\|u_n\|\le \|T\|M$, or simply a bounded operator sends a bounded set to a bounded one. It's OK to pick $\delta$ the way you did. To be slightly more clear, $|\sqrt{t} \cdot u_n(t)|= |\sqrt{t}|\cdot |u_n(t)|\le 1\cdot M = M$, hence $\int_x^{\tilde{x}}|\sqrt{t} \cdot u_n(t)|dt\le M|\tilde{x}-x|\le M\delta$.

  4. Gronwall is a very good tool for this. Another one would be to notice $f(x,u)=\frac{\sqrt{x}}{\lambda} \cdot u$ is continuous and Lipschitz for $u$, hence we can apply the Picard–Lindelöf theorem to conclude the only solution is zero (but this is not as good as Gronwall, since the latter is global while Picard is local and hence needs more care if complete rigor is needed.)

Just a user
  • 22,048
  • or said another way it's the trivial $L^1$-$L^{\infty}$ Holder inequality (which of course is proved by what you said, and is probably what OP was thinking of referencing).
  • – peek-a-boo Jun 23 '25 at 04:06
  • Thank you very much. When doing analysis I always feel like I’m writing less than I should or the opposite, I never feel satisfied by my answers. Need to grasp this subject in a better way. Thanks! – Alberto Andrenucci Jun 23 '25 at 04:31
  • 1
    @AlbertoAndrenucci The transitions from "pre-rigorous" to "rigorous" then "post-rigorous" stages (as laid out in Terry Tao's essay) in developing one's math thinking skills are challenging. I wish we could spend more time on this, but unfortunately in either schools or online platforms, there is shortage of resources and interests. Experienced users tend to be more into interesting questions for their tastes than to help others. – Just a user Jun 24 '25 at 01:08