Aas the comments indicate, the problem is wrong and this constant (let us call it $\alpha$) is transcendental.
I would suppose that one can give an elementary proof (by supposing a minimal polynomial and arguing in base 9), but this seems rather messy.
There are certain papers that prove similar results with elementary methods for the Kempner number $\sum_{n=0}^\infty 2^{-2^n}$ (Knight [1] has an elementary proof, but that paper is not freely available. Adamczewski gives their proof in Section 2 of [2]).
There are various deep mathemical results that imply that your number $\alpha$ is transcendental.
Let me use one due to Bugeaud and (once more) Adamczewski [3], which is also one of the strongest results we have for the basis expansions of algebraic numbers:
Theorem.
Let $\beta$ be an irrational real algebraic number and $b \ge 2$.
Then, write $p(k)$ for the factor complexity of $\beta$ in base $b$ (that is, the number of different strings $a_1a_2\cdots a_k \in \{0,\dots, b-1\}^k$ that occur in the base-$b$ expansion of $\beta$).
Then,
$$
\lim_{k\to+\infty} \frac{p(k)}{k} = +\infty\,.
$$
Now fix $b = 9$ and let us try to bound $p(k)$ for your constant $\alpha$.
Thus, in base $9$, $$\alpha = 0.\alpha_1\alpha_2\alpha_3\cdots = 0.011010010000100000001000\cdots\,.$$
We want to prove that $p(k) \le 3k$ for all $k \ge 1$.
To see this, fix $k$ and we will count the number of $m$ such that $\alpha_m\cdots\alpha_{m+k-1}$ contains two non-zero digits.
Then, for some natural number $n$, $m \le F_n < F_{n+1} \le m + k - 1$.
Thus, $m \le F_n$ and $k > F_{n+1} - F_n = F_{n-1} > \frac{1}{2}{F_n}$ and so $m \le 2k - 1$.
Thus, the only words $k$ in the base-$9$ expansion of $\alpha$ that contain two non-zero digits are $\alpha_1\cdots \alpha_{k-1},\dots,\alpha_{2k-1}\cdots\alpha_{3k-2}$.
Hence, as there are at most $k+1$ possible combinations to have a single non-zero digit (which has to be $1$) or no non-zero digit, we indeed have that $p(k) \le 2k-1 + k+1 = 3k$.
Only, $\frac{p(k)}{k} \le \frac{3k}{k} = 3$ and thus $\lim_{k\to\infty} \frac{p(k)}{k}$ is not infinity.
Hence, by the theorem, $\alpha$ is not an irrational real algebraic number.
As noted in the comments, the base-$9$ expansion of $\alpha$ is not periodic and so $\alpha$ is irrational.
Thus, $\alpha$ is transcendental.
[1] Knight, M. J. "An “oceans of zeros” proof that a certain non-Liouville number is transcendental." The American Mathematical Monthly 98.10 (1991): 947-949.
[2] Adamczewski, Boris. "The Many Faces of the Kempner Number." Journal of Integer Sequences 16.2 (2013): 3. https://adamczewski.perso.math.cnrs.fr/Kempner.pdf
[3] Adamczewski, Boris, and Yann Bugeaud. "On the complexity of algebraic numbers I. Expansions in integer bases." Annals of Mathematics (2007): 547-565. https://arxiv.org/pdf/math/0511674
RealField, so it appears to be a numerical coincidence unfortunately :( – Thinh Dinh Jun 14 '25 at 03:10