4

What is the classification of maps $S^{1}\times S^{3} \to S^{3}$ up to homotopy?

(I am firstly not sure my terminology is correct - I am looking for the suitable interpretation of "up to continuous deformation" which includes and generalizes the usual homotopy maps from an $n$-sphere into some space.)

I know that maps $ S^{3} \to S^{3}$ are characterized by $\pi_3(S^3)=\mathbb{Z}$, and maps $S^{4} \to S^{3}$ by $\pi_4(S^3)=\mathbb{Z}_2$. Also, any map $S^{1}\times S^{3} \to S^{3}$ induces a map $S^{3} \to S^{3}$, as well as a map $S^{1}\to S^{3}$, which has trivial homotopy, so my guess is that maps $S^{1}\times S^{3} \to S^{3}$ fall into equivalence classes isomorphic to $\mathbb{Z}$, though I am unsure how to show this rigorously.

Ben Steffan
  • 8,325
math_lover
  • 5,926

4 Answers4

12

Here is yet another answer. You can never have too many :)

There is additional structure present, because the space $S^3$ carries a topological group structure as the unit quaternions. Thus, the homotopy set $[S^1\times S^3,S^3]$ carries a natural group structure and we can compute this group. To this end, note that there exists a delooping $BS^3$, i.e. $S^3\simeq\Omega BS^3$. This allows us to compute \begin{align} [S^1\times S^3,S^3]&\cong[S^1\times S^3,S^3]_{\ast}\cong[S^1\times S^3,\Omega BS^3]_{\ast}\cong[\Sigma(S^1\times S^3),BS^3]_{\ast}\\ &\cong[\Sigma S^1\vee\Sigma S^3\vee\Sigma S^4,BS^3]_{\ast}\cong[S^2,BS^3]_{\ast}\times[S^4,BS^3]_{\ast}\times[S^5,BS^3]_{\ast}\\ &\cong\pi_2(BS^3)\times\pi_4(BS^3)\times\pi_5(BS^3)\cong\pi_1(S^3)\times\pi_3(S^3)\times\pi_4(S^3)\\ &\cong\mathbb{Z}\times\mathbb{Z}/2\mathbb{Z}. \end{align} Here, we have used that $S^3$ is simply connected (so there is no difference between pointed and unpointed homotopy classes), the adjunction $\Sigma\dashv\Omega$, the splitting formula $\Sigma(X\times Y)\cong\Sigma X\vee\Sigma Y\vee\Sigma(X\land Y)$ and the relationship $\pi_{n+1}(BG)\cong\pi_n(G)$.

Thorgott
  • 17,265
  • I am confused about the $\mathbb{Z}_2 \equiv \mathbb{Z}/2\mathbb{Z}$ factor. What class of maps is missing besides the ones coming from induced maps from each factor in the product into $S^3$, as I was wondering about in the problem statement? To take a simpler case to see if I understand your answer correctly, this means that $[S^1 x S^3, S^1] = \mathbb{Z}$ by analogous logic? If that is not correct and there is still a $\mathbb{Z}_2$ factor in this case, I would like to understand how which maps are distinguished by different class in the $\mathbb{Z}_2$. – math_lover May 31 '25 at 01:41
  • @math_lover You're correct about $[S^1\times S^3,S^1]$ (and there's also other ways of seeing that). The $\mathbb{Z}_2$ summand of $[S^1\times S^3,S^3]$ is generated by the composite $S^1\times S^3\rightarrow S^1\land S^3\cong S^4\rightarrow S^3$, where the first map is the canonocal quotient map and the second map generates $\pi_4(S^3)$, e.g. it is the suspension of the Hopf map. – Thorgott May 31 '25 at 16:57
8

Your guess is rather naïve: There is no good reason that homotopy classes of maps out of a product should correspond to products of homotopy classes out of the factors in general, and I'd think that generally determining the former in terms of the latter would be quite difficult.

For your particular example, however, you're in luck: You do not get $\mathbb{Z}$ as a result, but from this answer we have the following theorem:

Theorem (Steenrod): Let $X$ be a complex of dimension $n+1$, where $n \geq 3$. Then there is a bijection $$\newcommand{\Z}{\mathbb{Z}}\newcommand{\Sq}{\mathrm{Sq}} [X, S^n] \cong H^n(X; \Z) \times \operatorname{Coker} \phi, $$ where $\phi$ is the following composition: $$ H^{n-1}(X; \Z) \xrightarrow{\mod 2} H^{n-1}(X; \Z / 2) \xrightarrow{ \Sq^2 } H^{n+1}(X; \Z / 2) $$

Now $S^1 \times S^3$ has dimension 4, so the computation becomes a matter of plugging in: $[S^1 \times S^3, S^3] \cong H^3(S^1 \times S^3) \times \operatorname{Coker} \phi \cong \Z \oplus \Z / 2$ seeing as $H^2(S^1 \times S^3) = 0$ and $H^4(S^1 \times S^3; \Z / 2) \cong \Z / 2$.

Ben Steffan
  • 8,325
  • 4
    Perhaps an interesting point to add is that $[X, S^n]$ has a natural group structure in this range of dimensions (it is a cohomotopy group). The bijection stated in the answer is generally not a group isomorphism and is not natural: it comes from splitting an exact sequence $0 \to coker \phi \to [X, S^n] \to H^n(X) \to 0$. In the present case this exact sequence splits, so we do get an isomorphism of groups $[S^1 \times S^3, S^3] \cong \Bbb{Z} \oplus \Bbb{Z}/2$. – Derived Cats May 27 '25 at 13:44
8

Here is an alternative argument to the one Ben gave.

Consider the fiber sequence $\Omega S^3 \to \mathcal{L} S^3 \to S^3$ where $\mathcal{L}S^3 = \mathsf{Map}(S^1, S^3)$ is the free loop space. It induces a long exact sequence on homotopy groups which we will use in two ways.

The first consequence is that there is an exact sequence $\pi_1 \Omega S^3 \to \pi_1 \mathcal{L} S^3 \to \pi_1 S^3$, so $\pi_1 \mathcal{L} S^3$ is sandwiched between $0$'s, meaning it is itself $0$. Similarly about $\pi_0$. Thus, $\mathcal{L} S^3$ is simply-connected. Thus, $$ [S^1 \times S^3, S^3] \cong [S^3, \mathcal L S^3] \cong [S^3, \mathcal L S^3]_* \cong \pi_3 \mathcal{L} S^3 $$ where the second equivalence uses the simply-connectedness to pass to based homotopy classes. For this, we consider the portion in the LES reading $\pi_3 \Omega S^3 \to \pi_3 \mathcal{L} S^3 \to \pi_3 S^3$. Since $\mathcal{L}S^3 \to S^3$ admits a section (by sending $x \in S^3$ to the constant loop at $x$), this is a split exact SES. Therefore, $$ \pi_3 \mathcal L S^3 \cong \pi_3 \Omega S^3 \oplus \pi_3 S^3 \cong \pi_4 S^3 \oplus \pi_3 S^3 \cong \mathbb{Z}/2 \oplus \mathbb{Z}. $$ A bit of work that is slightly hidden in this argument is $\pi_4 S^3 \cong \mathbb{Z}/2$ which does require some computational techniques, e.g. some Serre spectral sequence argument.

Qi Zhu
  • 9,413
3

As others have alluded to, you are asking to find the cohomotopy group $\pi^3(S^1\times S^3)$, which is $\mathbb{Z}\oplus\mathbb{Z}/2$. More generally, $\pi^3(X)$ is known for any closed connected oriented 4-manifold $X$ by Theorem 1 of the paper Kirby, Melvin, & Teichner - Cohomotopy sets of 4-manifolds. Namely, if $X$ has odd intersection form, then $\pi^3(X) \cong H_1(X)$, while if $X$ is spin, then $\pi^3(X) \cong H_1(X)\oplus\mathbb{Z}/2$. This result uses the Theorem of Steenrod mentioned in Ben Steffan's answer, and has a careful analysis of the splitting of the exact sequence mentioned in the comment by Derived Cats.