I have difficulties with Cantors proof. The main concern is that proof generates a “new” number which doesn’t have a corresponding natural number. So my question is split up into two questions:
- If we generate a number, doesn’t it have a corresponding N by definition, because we have already said that these two sets are bijective?
- If we use “mirror” bijection rule $(0:1)$ so we get $1$ out of $0.1$ and $12345$ out of $0.54321$, wouldn’t that imply that if there is a Cantors new number, there is already a unique natural corresponding number?