3

Ben Steffan recently asked whether a $4$-manifold can be an Eilenberg-MacLane space $K(G, n), n \ge 2$ (and $G$ an arbitrary abelian group). Personally I would guess that the answer is no, and moreover I would guess that this is not specific to $4$-manifolds: more precisely, I would guess that for $G$ nontrivial and $n \ge 2$, $K(G, n)$ has infinite cohomological dimension, so cannot be a manifold (or CW complex) of any (finite) dimension.

Question: Is this true?

Classical computations with spectral sequences imply that this is true if $G$ is cyclic, hence if it's finitely generated, and rational homotopy stuff implies that this is true if $G$ is a $\mathbb{Q}$-vector space, but I don't know what happens in general. Since the cohomology $H^m(K(G, n), A)$ can be identified with the set of cohomology operations $H^n(-, G) \to H^m(-, A)$, an equivalent question is whether for $n \ge 2$ there are always nonvanishing cohomology operations on a cohomology class of degree $n$ with coefficients in $G$, sending it to another cohomology class of arbitrarily high degree with some coefficients.

At least for $n$ even here is a potential candidate for such an operation: I believe there should be an "external cup power" operation $H^n(-, G) \to H^{nk}(-, G^{\otimes k})$ for any $k \ge 1$. Unfortunately $G^{\otimes k}$ can vanish for $k \ge 2$, for example if $G = \mathbb{Q}/\mathbb{Z}$.

What would be ideal is a version for $n \ge 1$ of the argument for $n = 1$ that if $H \le G$ is a subgroup then $\text{cd}(K(H, 1)) \le \text{cd}(K(G, 1))$, which would let us reduce to the cyclic case. I guess the natural idea is to look at the Serre spectral sequence associated to the fibration $K(G/H, n-1) \to K(H, n) \to K(G, n)$; I've never been fluent with spectral sequences but offhand this only seems to imply that if $K(H, n)$ has infinite cohomological dimension then either $K(G, n)$ or $K(G/H, n-1)$ must also have infinite cohomological dimension.

Ben Steffan
  • 8,325
Qiaochu Yuan
  • 468,795
  • This is pretty much a duplicate of a question from 2011 (which received a good but unsatisfactory answer). https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/84422/finite-dimensional-eilenberg-maclane-spaces – Moishe Kohan Jan 19 '25 at 18:30
  • @Moishe: that question looks easier to me; asking for a finite complex is a stronger condition since it rules out $G$ infinitely generated. – Qiaochu Yuan Jan 19 '25 at 18:34
  • 1
    The question asked for a finite dimensional complex. The answer was unsatisfactory. As it frequently happens, the OP accepted an unsatisfactory answer because.... who knows... Maybe they did not know the difference between finite and finite-dimensional, or maybe they have learned a lot from the answer (which is indeed quite informative).... – Moishe Kohan Jan 19 '25 at 18:38
  • @QiaochuYuan If this was true and known, then why would my question which you cite exist? It is interesting precisely because this is false! :) It seems that you have not followed the links to other questions contained in mine because some of them give counterexample to this. In fact, any text that treats the Serre spectral sequence should compute $H^*(K(\mathbb{Q}, n))$, which is exterior on a single class in dimension $n$ when $n$ is odd. But let me write up an answer... – Ben Steffan Jan 19 '25 at 23:38

1 Answers1

5

This is false.

I assume that you still only care about $n \geq 2$ since any $K(\mathbb{Z}, 1)$ is a counterexample. It is a standard application of the Serre spectral sequence and Serre class theory that $K(G, n)$ has infinite cohomological dimension if $G$ is finitely generated, as you say. But then you state that "rational homotopy stuff implies that this is true if $G$ is a $\mathbb{Q}$-vector space", and this is false: The computation of $H_*(K(\mathbb{Q}, n))$ is another standard application of the Serre spectral sequence, and it yields that $$ \tilde{H}_k(K(\mathbb{Q}, n)) \cong \begin{cases} \mathbb{Q} & n \text{ odd},\ k = n \\ \mathbb{Q} & n \text{ even},\ k > 0 \text{ and } n \mid k \\ 0 & \text{else} \end{cases} $$ By the UCT, we then find that $$ \tilde{H}^k(K(\mathbb{Q}, 2n + 1)) \cong \begin{cases} \mathbb{Q} & k = 2n + 1 \\ \operatorname{Ext}(\mathbb{Q}, \mathbb{Z}) & k = 2n + 2 \\ 0 & \text{else} \end{cases} $$ so $K(\mathbb{Q}, 2n + 1)$ is of finite cohomological dimension.

As for cohomology operations, you need to be more careful: If $G$ is the additive group of a ring, then sure, you'll have cup powers. These will take the form $H^n({{-}}; G) \Rightarrow H^{kn}({{-}}; G)$, and will give rise to elements in $H^{kn}(K(G, n); G)$. But they can be zero: For instance this must be the case if $G$ has no 2-torsion and $n$ is odd since the cup product is graded-commutative (I'll leave it as an exercise to ponder the connection to the cohomology of $K(\mathbb{Q}, n)$ stated above). If $G$ is not the additive group of a ring, e.g. when $G$ is a Prüfer group, then there is no reason to expect something like cup powers to exist at all. Producing other (provably non-zero) cohomology operations is generally much more difficult.

The natural generalization to ask is thus "For which combinations of $G$ and $n$ is $K(G, n)$ of finite cohomological dimension?" I do not know the answer to this question, but this fantastic answer resolves the weaker question of "For which combinations of $G$ and $n$ is $K(G, n)$ of homological dimension $n$:" In this case it turns out that $(\mathbb{Q}, 2n + 1)$ and $(P, 2n)$ where $P$ is a product of Prüfer $p$-groups for odd primes $p$ are the only positive answers.

Ben Steffan
  • 8,325
  • 1
    Oh, of course, I've been very silly, thanks. – Qiaochu Yuan Jan 20 '25 at 00:31
  • This doesn't affect the validity of the counterexample, but what coefficients is that $K(\mathbb{Q}, n)$ computation in? I believe this is correct with $\mathbb{Q}$ coefficients but with $\mathbb{Z}$ coefficients isn't there an extra Ext term as Andre mentions here: https://mathoverflow.net/a/211730/290 – Qiaochu Yuan Jan 20 '25 at 00:40
  • @QiaochuYuan Ah, good catch. Yes, the cohomology should pick up another $\mathrm{Ext}$-term. It's very late here right now, but I'll correct this tomorrow. – Ben Steffan Jan 20 '25 at 01:53