I'm looking for a pair $(X,x)$ consisting of a topological space $X$ with a distinguised point $x \in X$ such that canon inclusion $i_x: x \to X$ is not a cofibration, ie not satisfied homotopy extension property.
There are known several examples for pairs of spaces $(X,A)$ (see eg here or here) violating HEP,
but I would like to see one where $A$ is really just a single point.
Are there also a "heuristic/intuitive" reasons what potentially obstucts/prevents a homotopy $H_A:\{x\} \times I \to T$ with prescribed map $f: X \to T$ to admit such an extension $H_X: X \times I \to T$ with $H_X \vert _{A \times I}=H_A$ and $H_0=f$? ($T$ some test space)
Which picture one should keep in mind seeking for a counterexample? Clearly $(X,x)$ isn't allowed to be a CW-pair, so it becomes rather "weird".
Inspired by this I would guess (but was till now without success in proving it) that
$X = \{0\}\cup\left\{\frac{1}{n} \ : \ n \in\mathbb{N}\right\}$ with $A= x=\{0\}$ (with subspace topology inherited from $\Bbb R$) could have desired properties.
Then a homotopy $H_A:\{x\} \times I \to T$ corresponds simply to a path $p_x: I \to T$. So the question is to find a weird enough "test space" $T$ and a map $f: X \to T$ to it "entangling" bad enough such that potential homotopy $H_X: X \times I \to T$ cannot garantee to restrict to $H_A$ and $f$ simultaneosly.
Is it possible to produce with such $X$ the desired counter example?