5

There is a natural embedding $\Phi$ of the (algebraic) tensor product $\ell^\infty({\mathbb N})\otimes\ell^\infty({\mathbb N})$ into the Banach space $\ell^\infty({\mathbb N}\times{\mathbb N})$ given by $$\big(\Phi(x\otimes y)\big)_{(n,m)}=x_n\cdot y_m$$ on elementary tensors and extended using linearity.

Question: Is the image of $\Phi$ dense with respect to the weak topology?

The fact that I can not answer it gives me the nagging suspicion that the answer is negative, but I'm hoping that it is positive.

It's easy to see that the image of $\Phi$ is not dense in norm; indeed its norm closure will not contain the vector $x_{n,m}=1_{n=m}$. On the other hand, as point out by Ben Grossmann in the comments, the image of $\Phi$ is dense in the weak$^*$ topology. I also believe that the restriction of $\Phi$ to $\ell^p({\mathbb N})\otimes\ell^p({\mathbb N})$ is dense in $\ell^p({\mathbb N}\times{\mathbb N})$ for every $1\leq p<\infty$, even in norm.

Joel Moreira
  • 357
  • 1
  • 9

1 Answers1

4

As requested by the OP, here is my comment, re-organized into an answer:

By Hahn-Banach, the closure of a convex subset under the weak topology coincides with its closure under the norm topology. In particular, since the range of $\Phi$ is a linear subspace, it is weakly dense iff it is norm-dense. As the OP has already observed, the range of $\Phi$ is not norm-dense, so it is not weakly dense either.

David Gao
  • 22,850
  • 9
  • 28
  • 48