I am considering an ODE system as follows: $$\dot{x}(t) = A(t)x(t) + g(t,x),$$ where $A(t)\in \mathbb{R}^{n\times n}$ for any $t\geqslant t_0$, and $g(t,x)$ is a vanishing perturbing term (i.e., $g(t,0)=0$ for all $t\geqslant t_0$) satisfying $\Vert g(t,x)\Vert\leqslant \gamma \Vert x\Vert$ (edit: Here $\gamma \rightarrow 0$ when $\Vert x\Vert \rightarrow 0$ ). I want to find a Lyapunov function that meets two conditions: (1) $\alpha_1(\Vert x\Vert)\leqslant V(t,x)\leqslant \alpha_2(\Vert x\Vert)$; and (2) $\frac{d}{dt} V(t,x(t)) = \frac{\partial V}{\partial t}+\frac{\partial V}{\partial x}\dot{x}(t)\leqslant -\alpha_3(\Vert x\Vert)$, where functions $\alpha_1, \alpha_2, \alpha_3$ are class-$\mathcal{K}$ function. Choosing the Lyapunov function of its nominal system $\dot{x}(t) = A(t)x(t)$ ,$V = x^T P(t) x$ where $P(t)$ satisfies matrix differential equation $-\dot{P}(t) = P(t)A(t)+A^T(t)P(t)+Q(t)$, seems quite reasonable. Here $Q(t)$ can be any continuous positive-definite time-varying bounded matrix. We can assume $0<c_1I\leqslant Q(t)\leqslant c_2I$. The solution of above matrix differential equation is given by $P(t) = \int_{t}^{\infty} \Phi^T(\tau,t)Q(\tau)\Phi(\tau,t)d\tau$, where $\Phi(\tau,t)=e^{\int_{t}^{\tau} A(s)ds}$ is the state transition matrix of the nominal system.
My attempt: It is easy to verify that this Lyapunov function meets condition (2), by properly bounding the perturbing term when taking derivative of it. If assuming that the $0$ equilibrium point of nominal system is exponentially stable (implying that $\Vert \Phi(\tau,t)\Vert\leqslant ke^{-\lambda (\tau-t)}$), then the upper bound of $V$ can be obtained by $$V(t,x)\leqslant \Vert x\Vert^2 \cdot c_2\int_{t}^{\infty}\Vert \Phi(\tau,t)\Vert^2d\tau \leqslant c_3 \Vert x\Vert^2.$$ However, I just cannot bound the $V$ from below. I have already known how lower bound is obtained in the linear time-varying situation, by assuming that $\Vert A(t)\Vert \leqslant L$, and the state-transition property that $\Phi(\tau,t)x(t;t_0,x_0) = x(\tau; t,x(t))$. But it is not the same in the perturbed system. I have chosen the $\Phi(\tau,t)$ as the state transition matrix of the nominal system, and the solution of original system doesn't have state-transition property in terms of $\Phi(\tau,t)$.
My question: Is the $0$ equilibrium point of this perturbed system reach stability for sure? If not, is there counter-example? If so, can anyone bound the $V$ from below in the form of a class-$\mathcal{K}$ function? Any reasonable extra assumption is allowed to made, and any other form of Lyapunov function is welcomed.