0

I would like to prove that

$$ A=\{(x,y,z) : z= \frac{\sin(x^2+y^2)}{x^2+y^2}, (x,y)\neq 0\} $$

is a smooth sub-manifold of dimension $2$.

I think it is a direct application of the inverse function theorem on the map $f(x,y,z)=(x,y,z-\frac{\sin(x^2+y^2)}{x^2+y^2})$ where $f : (\mathbb{R}^{2}\setminus\{(0,0)\})\times\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}^{3}$.

Attempt :

A simple computation proves that its differential is surjective ($\det(df_{(x,y,z)})\neq 0$) at any point of $A\subset(\mathbb{R}^{2}\setminus\{(0,0)\})\times\mathbb{R}$. Let $(x,y,z)\in A$, by the inverse function theorem, there exists an open set $U$ of $(\mathbb{R}^{2}\setminus\{(0,0)\})\times\mathbb{R}$ such that $f : U\to f(U)$ is a diffeomorphism. Now let $V=U\cap A$, we have that $\tilde{f}=f_{|V}$ is an homeomorphism from $V$ to $\tilde{f}(V)$ where $\tilde{f}(V)$ is now an open set of $\mathbb{R}^{2}\times\{0\}$ (considering the subspace topology on $A$ and $\mathbb{R}^{2}\times\{0\}$) and it admits a smooth extension (i.e. a map $F$ defined on an open set $O\subset(\mathbb{R}^{2}\setminus\{(0,0)\})\times\mathbb{R}$ smooth in the classical sense such that $F_{|V}=\tilde{f}$) trivially given by $f$. The same applies for its inverse $\tilde{f}^{-1}$. Finally, $\mathbb{R}^{2}\times\{0\}$ is diffeomorphic to $\mathbb{R}^2$, denote $p : \mathbb{R}^{2}\times\{0\}\to \mathbb{R}^2$ this diffeomorphism. Then $p\circ\tilde{f}$ sends diffeomorphically $V$ an open set of $A$ containing $(x,y,z)$ to an open set of $\mathbb{R}^2$.

Since $(x,y,z)\in A$ was arbitrary, this shows that $A$ is a smooth sub-manifold of dimension $2$.

Is this seems correct to you ?

Thank you a lot !


Sorry I forgot to mention that the definitions of a smooth manifold, a smooth map and a diffeomorphism that I use are the one used in Milnor’s book.In particular Paul Frost’s answer in this post detailed it Milnor's definition of smooth manifold

G2MWF
  • 1,615
  • Write out your proof in detail, step by step. Your answer is incomplete or wrong if even you k ow that you haven’t verified every assumption of a theorem. – Deane Jun 06 '24 at 14:16
  • @Deane Thank you for your comment. I followed your advice, let me know if it is still not correct please. – G2MWF Jun 06 '24 at 15:12
  • Do you not know in general that the graph of a smooth function is a smooth submanifold? – Ted Shifrin Jun 07 '24 at 19:34
  • @TedShifrin I have heard this result but never proved it. I encountered this particular case (that has a very nice graph I have to say) and I thought it would be a good idea to try to prove it and I naturally thought of the inverse function theorem. I updated the title to be clearer. – G2MWF Jun 07 '24 at 20:48
  • 2
    I do not know what definitions you are using or what you have. I would not use the inverse function theorem. Either (1) The mapping $\pi(x,f(x))=x$ gives a chart on the entire graph (or $\phi(x)=(x,f(x))$ gives a diffeomorphism onto the graph) or (2) by the implicit function theorem the zero-set of $F(x,y)=y-f(x)$ is a submanifold. (Here $x$ and $y$ can be in arbitrary dimensions.) – Ted Shifrin Jun 07 '24 at 21:18
  • Thank you for the comment ! I did not think of the implicit function theorem, but the first idea is close to the intuition I tried to translate in my proof. I used the definition of a smooth map between arbitrary subsets of the euclidean space given in Milnor’s book topology from the differentiable viewpoint (and as a consequence his definition of a diffeomorphism between arbitrary subsets of the euclidean space), I will add it to the post it was very ambiguous to not mention it sorry. – G2MWF Jun 07 '24 at 22:06
  • What are the definitions of manifold and submanifold you are trying to use? – Deane Jun 09 '24 at 17:15

0 Answers0