0

Given norm-to-norm continuous map $T:\ell^{\infty}\rightarrow L^{p}$, $p\geq 1$. Does norm-to-norm continuous imply weak*-to-weak continuous?

I have learnt that: if $T$ is norm-norm continuous then it is weak-weak continuous, what about weak*-to-weak continuous?

The bot mention A linear map $S:Y^*\to X^*$ is weak$^*$ continuous if and only if $S=T^*$ for some $T\in B(X,Y)$, I am a green hand, but I think weak* continuous is weak* -to-norm continuous, not weak*-to-weak continuous.

  • 1
    Actually, in the second linked question, weak$^\ast$ continuous means weak$^\ast$-to-weak$^\ast$ continuous, not weak$^\ast$-to-norm continuous. – David Gao Apr 27 '24 at 21:56
  • https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/337103/a-linear-operator-between-banach-spaces-is-weakly-continuous-iff-norm-continuous?noredirect=1&lq=1 – Guy Fsone Apr 19 '25 at 10:46

2 Answers2

2

Write $X = l^\infty$ and $Y=L_p$. We will use: $X$ is a dual space but not reflexive, and $Y \ne \{0\}$.

Since $X$ is not reflexive, there is a bounded linear functional $\phi$ on $X$ that is not weak* continuous. Choose a nonzero vector $u \in Y$. Define rank-one operator $T : X \to Y$ by $$ T(x) = \phi(x) u,\quad x \in X . $$ Then $T$ is norm-norm continuous, but not weak*-weak continuous.

GEdgar
  • 117,296
0

If $T$ is norm continuous. Assume $x_n\rightharpoonup x$ for a continuous linear form so that $f\circ T$ is also a linear continuous form. Hence $f\circ Tx_n\to f\circ Tx$. This means that $ Tx_n\rightharpoonup Tx$.

Conversely, assume $T$ is weakly continuous. If $T$ is not norm continuous, then in particular $T$ is not continuous at the origin $x=0$. Thence there is $r>0$ such that for all $n\geq 1$ there is $x_n$ such that $\|y_n\|\leq \frac{1}{n^2}$ and $\|Ty_n\|\geq r$

Letting $x_n= ny_n$ we find that $\|x_n\|\leq\frac1n\to 0$ and $\|Tx_n\|= n\|Ty_n\|\geq rn\to\infty.$

In particular $x_n\rightharpoonup 0$ weakly and hence the weak continuity of $T$ implies $Tx_n\rightharpoonup 0$ weakly, which in turn implies that $(Tx_n)_n$ is norm bounded. This is clearly a contradiction since $\|Tx_n\|\to\infty.$ Necessarily $T$ is norm continuous.

Guy Fsone
  • 25,237