I'm trying to fill in the details of the systematic approach of deriving the quadratic resolvent for the cubic equation according to this part of the 3Blue1Brown talk: https://youtu.be/aaW30_f2on0?t=4374. To sum up, given a cubic
$$x^3 + px + q$$
the idea is to find some polynomial expression in its roots $a, b, c$ with the orbit of size 2 under the actions of $S_3$. The suggested expressions
$$A = a^2b + b^2c + c^2a$$ $$B = a^2c + b^2a + c^2b$$
indeed constitute such an orbit. Therefore the quadratic polynomial $$(y - A)(y - B) = y^2 - (A +B)y + AB$$ has coefficients in the $p, q$. These coefficients can be expressed in the elementary symmetric polynomials ($e_1=0, e_2=p, e_3=-q$) as follows (I used Sage for the reduction): $$A+B = -3e_3 = 3q$$ $$AB = e_2^3 + 9e_3^2 = p^3 + 9q^2$$ Computing the discriminant of this quadratic equation yields: $$D = -4p^3 - 27q^2$$ This looks promising since this is up to a constant factor (and sign) the same expression as the one appearing in the final cubic formulas. Moreover, it coincides with the official discriminant of the cubic equation.
The question is, however, how to proceed from this point, i.e. how to derive the expressions for the roots $a, b, c$ of the original cubic. The only relations between the roots we have so far are the original expressions
$$A = a^2b + b^2c + c^2a$$ $$B = a^2c + b^2a + c^2b$$
We can now express the left-hand sides as (radical) expressions of $p$ and $q$ but of course this does not fully determine $a, b, c$.
- The action of a 5-cycle on an expression with an orbit of size 4 must be trivial (since gcd(5,4) = 1)
- Every element of $S_5$ can be generated by a 5-cycle and a transposition.
- Therefore such an expression cannot exist.
– David Kubecka Jan 15 '24 at 22:24