4

Question background: In particle physics, the weak interaction symmetry group is described by $G=SU(2)\times U(1)$, which is spontaneously broken into $H=U(1)_{em}$. ($U(1)_{em}$ is the electromagnetic interaction group). The generator of $U(1)_{em}$ is $T^3+Y$, where $T^3$ is the diagonal Lie algebra of $SU(2)$, $Y$ is the generator of $U(1)$ before the symmetry breaking.

Now, I want to research the second homotopy group of $$\pi_2(G/H) \tag{1}$$ in the spontaneous symmetry breaking process. In general, we have the relation (for example, see John Preskill's Magnetic Monopoles, page 483, the paragraph below Eq.(53)) $$\pi_2(G/H)=\pi_1(H)/\pi_1(G) \tag{2} $$ And since $\pi_1(U(1))=Z$, I am wondering what's the value for $$\pi_1(G)=\pi_1(SU(2)\times U(1)) $$

More generally,

  1. What's the value for $\pi_n(A\times B)$, where $A$ and $B$ are two connected groups? Would this equals to $\pi_n(A)\otimes \pi_n(B)$ or $\pi_n(A)\oplus\pi_n(B)$?
  2. I am told that $\pi_2(G/H)=0$ for my above example, so I am interested in how $\pi_1(H)/\pi_1(G)$ leads to zero in my example.
Daren
  • 225
  • 1
  • 7
  • 1
    Where did you get the relation $\pi_2(G/H)\cong\pi_1(H)/\pi_1(G)$ from? In general, you only have a long exact sequence of which a part reads $\ldots\to\pi_2(H)\to\pi_2(G)\to\pi_2(G/H)\to\pi_1(H)\to\pi_1(G)\to\pi_1(G/H)\to\ldots$, which doesn't give you this. (For instance, how is $\pi_1(G)$ a subgroup of $\pi_1(H)$?) – Daniël Apol Jan 02 '24 at 14:04
  • 2
    For your first question, $\pi_n(A\times B)\cong\pi_n(A)\times\pi_n(B)$. This result is covered in most textbooks of algebraic topology. – Kevin.S Jan 02 '24 at 14:07
  • 1
    Also, what is $H=U(1)_\mathrm{em}$ exactly? Is it isomorphic to $U(1)$? – Daniël Apol Jan 02 '24 at 14:07
  • 1
  • For any spaces $X, Y$, each $\pi_n(X \times Y) = \pi_n(X) \oplus \pi_n(Y)$; the isomorphism is induced from the projection maps. 2. Any Lie group $G$ has $\pi_2 G = 0$. There are a number of proofs of this fact, but I don't think any of them is elementary. The comment above explains why this doesn't imply that $\pi_1 G = \pi_1 H$ in your situation. (In general, you just wind up with a long exact sequence, spectral sequence, etc., but that's often good enough.)
  • – anomaly Jan 02 '24 at 14:09
  • @Kevin.S Thanks you so much! I am a physics major student. If you could recommend me some textbooks on this, I would be really appreciate. – Daren Jan 02 '24 at 14:17
  • @DaniëlApol For your first comment, that appears in the paper by John Preskill (See my link in the post). And I am a particle physics major student, so I would be really appreciate it if you could provide more details. – Daren Jan 02 '24 at 14:20
  • 2
    @Daren For a specific reference of this fact, you might find this helpful. Allen Hatcher's Algebraic Topology covers this in chapter 4 (homotopy theory). Alternative references can be found under this thread. – Kevin.S Jan 02 '24 at 14:26
  • @Kevin.S Thank you so much! – Daren Jan 02 '24 at 14:29
  • @Kevin.S Could I ask you more about the notation details? You mentioned that $\pi_n(A\times B)=\pi_n(A)\times \pi_n(B)$, would this equals to $\pi_n(A)\oplus \pi_n(B)$? And I want to make sure if $\pi_1(U(1))/\pi_1(SU(2)\times U(1))=Z/(0\oplus Z)=1 \text{ or } 0$? Thank you so much! – Daren Jan 03 '24 at 07:11
  • 1
    @Daren (for your first question) Yes, the direct product and the direct sum are isomorphic for finitely many summands. (for your second question) You're regarding $\pi_1(SU(2)\times U(1))$ as a subgroup of $\pi_1 U(1)$, which doesn't seem to make a lot of sense. Also, subgroups of $\Bbb Z$ are of the form $n\Bbb Z$. If you intend to compute something like $\Bbb Z/\Bbb Z$, then this is the trivial group ${0}$. – Kevin.S Jan 03 '24 at 17:13