7

$X(t)$ is a time dependent family of smooth vector fields on $M$, and $\psi_t$ is the local flow of $X(t)$, namely for any smooth $f:M\rightarrow R$ $$ X(\psi_t(y),t) f = \frac{\partial(f\circ \psi_t)}{\partial t} (y) $$ Let $$ \hat g(t) =\sigma(t) \psi_t^*(g(t)) $$ How to show $$ \partial_t \hat g = \sigma'(t)\psi_t^* (g) + \sigma(t) \psi_t^*(\partial_t g) + \sigma(t) \psi_t^*(L_Xg) $$ where $L_Xg$ is Lie derivative. I think it is equal to show $$ \partial _t (\psi_t^*(g(t))) = \psi_t^*(\partial_t g) + \psi_t^*(L_Xg) $$ but I don't know how to show it. I feel calculate $\partial_t \psi_t^*$ is the key point. But seemly, it is hard to represent it.

What I know about Lie derivative : $$ L_Xg(p) =\lim_{t\rightarrow 0} \frac{\psi_t^*(g(\psi_t(p))) - g(p)}{t} $$

PS: This problem is from the Proposition 1.2.1 of Topping's Lectures on the Ricci flow. Topping's hint: $$ \psi_t^*(g(t))=\psi_t^*(g(t)-g(s))+\psi_t^*(g(s)) $$ and differentiate at $t=s$.

Enhao Lan
  • 6,682

2 Answers2

4

After some think, I have a flawed answer.

The diffeomorphisms $\psi_t$ of $X(t)$ satisfy $$ \partial_t \psi_t(y) = X(t)(y), ~~~\psi_0(y)=y,~~~\forall y \in M \tag{1} $$ Although the geometry of $\psi_t$ is complex for me, but I feel (1) has local existence, then by the compact of $M$, (1) should have global existence. But just feel, about this, I do not to read book now.

Therefore, for $f:M\rightarrow R$, I have $$ X(t)(\psi_t(y))f = \frac{d}{dt}(f\circ \psi_t(y)) $$

Now, I have $$ \partial_t \hat g(t) = \sigma'(t) \psi_t^*(g) +\sigma(t) \psi_t^*(\partial_tg) + \sigma(t) (\partial_t\psi_t^*)(g) $$ noticing $\psi_t^*$ is linear transformation, any linear transformation can be treated as time a matrix, therefore, it meet Leibniz/product rule.

Besides, since $\psi_t^*\circ\psi_{\Delta t}^* = \psi_{t+\Delta t}^*$I have $$ (\partial_t\psi_t^*)(g)= \lim_{\Delta t \rightarrow 0} \frac{\psi^*_{t+\Delta t} -\psi_t^*}{\Delta t}g = \psi_t^*(\lim_{\Delta t \rightarrow 0} \frac{\psi^*_{\Delta t}(g) -g}{\Delta t}) =\psi_t^*(L_{X(0)}g) $$ So, I have $$ \partial_t \hat g(t) = \sigma'(t) \psi_t^*(g) +\sigma(t) \psi_t^*(\partial_tg) + \sigma(t) \psi_t^*(L_{X(0)}g) $$ Last, I am not sure whether the Topping's $L_Xg$ is $L_{X(0)}g$.

PS: I am not sure about the global existence of (1) and the mean of $L_Xg$. If you know, please tell me, thanks.

Enhao Lan
  • 6,682
2

I am recently reading Peter topping’s book and I follow the hint in the book to give an explanation. I will only give the calculation of the difficult part in your problem, the left is quite easy and you just need to combine all of them. First have $$\frac{\partial\hat{g}}{\partial t}=\sigma'(t)\psi^*_t(g)+\sigma(t)(\psi^{*}_t(g(t)))'$$. We then write \begin{equation} \psi_t^*(g(t))=\psi^*_t(g(t)-g(s))+\psi_t^*(g(s)). \end{equation} Thus we differentiate at $t=s$, and obtain \begin{equation} \begin{aligned} \frac{\partial}{\partial t}\bigg|_{t=s} \psi_t^*(g(t)) &=\frac{\partial}{\partial t}\bigg|_{t=s}\psi^*_t(g(t)-g(s))+\frac{\partial}{\partial t}\bigg|_{t=s}\psi^*_t(g(s)) \\ &= \lim_{t\rightarrow s}\frac{\psi^*_t(g(t)-g(s))-\psi^*_s(0)}{t-s}+\lim_{t\rightarrow s}\frac{\psi^*_t(g(s))-\psi_s^*(g(s))}{t-s} \\ &= \lim_{t\rightarrow s}\frac{\psi_t^*(g(t)-g(s))}{t-s}+\lim_{t\rightarrow 0}\frac{\psi^*_{t+s}g(s)-\psi_s^*(g(s))}{t} \\ &=\psi^*_t(\frac{\partial g}{\partial t})\bigg|_{t=s}+\psi_s^*L_Xg(s)\\ &=\psi^*_t(\frac{\partial g}{\partial t})\bigg|_{t=s}+\psi_t^*L_Xg(t)\bigg|_{t=s}. \end{aligned} \end{equation} We notice that $s$ is arbitrary and finish the proof. If you find any mistake, do tell me and we can have a further discussion since I just start studying the Ricci flow.

  • I have stopped studying Ricci flow for a month since the Spring Festival. Some things I've forgotten. But I feel your answer is right. Thanks. – Enhao Lan Mar 01 '22 at 00:38
  • You are welcome. – HONGHAOJIE YOU Mar 01 '22 at 03:41
  • I think we make a same mistake. In fact, $\psi_t$ is not one-parameter transformation. And there is not $\psi_t^\circ\psi_{\Delta t}^ = \psi_{t+\Delta t}^*$. There is a counterexample in https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/4531798/analogue-of-one-parameter-transformation-for-time-dependent-vector-field – Enhao Lan Sep 15 '22 at 13:33
  • No this doee not matter. It is an one-paremeter transformation definitely which can be proved similarly as the case for a fixed vector field. – HONGHAOJIE YOU Sep 17 '22 at 10:03
  • I also have a look at your counter example, but I am not so clear with it. As I said, the is one parameter transformations exists for a small time interval due to ODE, in your counterter example you think time t=1,2,3 right? Maybe the time is too long comparing to the existence of ODE theorey. – HONGHAOJIE YOU Sep 18 '22 at 02:04
  • The counter examle is alright (it can be changed to in small time). I spend some time in An introduction to the manifold. I am sure the method in Topping's book is wrong (Although there are many other book or paper have similiar result). The right result should be the Bryant's paper Ricci flow solitons in dimension three with SO(3)-symmetries. The $\varphi_t$ should be changed to $\varphi_{h(t)}$. But I still unfinish the detail of Bryant's paper (He gave no details). – Enhao Lan Sep 19 '22 at 13:04