I know there exist functions like this one for simplifying tetration based sums. There may be a way to simplify this type of sum at least using a lesser known and widely accepted functions. Here are some results as proof: graphical visualization of results and calculation of special case and integral version of special case.
It was a nice idea to find the sophomore’s dream, but I thought that it would be more interesting if I could find a “generalized exponential sophomore’s dream”. This post uses the following functions: regularized gamma functions, the exponential integral function, and tetration. There was an annoying discontinuity at n=0 hence the constant term:
$$\mathrm{\int_0^b \, ^2\left(a^t\right) \, dt=\int_0^b a^{ta^t} \, dt = b + \sum_{n=1}^\infty\frac{\ln^n(a)}{n!}\int_0^b t^n a^{tn} \, dt = \boxed{\mathrm{b+\frac1{\ln(a)}\sum_{n=1}^\infty\frac{(-1)^nP\big(n+1,-n\,b\ln(a)\big)}{n^{n+1}}}}\implies \int_{-\frac1e}^0 e^{{te}^t} \, dt = 1+\sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{(-1)^nP(n+1,n)}{n^{n+1}}=0.77215…}$$
$$\mathrm{\implies A(a,t)\mathop=^\text{def}\int \,^2\left(a^t\right)dt=C+t+\frac1{ln(a)}\sum_{n=0}^\infty \frac{(-1)^n Q(n+1,-nt\,ln(a))}{n^{n+1}}=\quad C+t-t\sum_{n=0}^\infty \frac{(t\,ln(a))^n E_{-n}(-nt\,ln(a))}{n!}}$$
This series reminds me of the Marcum Q function for non negative integers: $$\mathrm{Q_m(a,b)=1-e^{-\frac{a^2}2}\sum_{n=0}^\infty\left(\frac{a^2}{2}\right)^n\frac{P\left(m+n,\frac{b^2}2\right)}{n!}}$$
This representation is good, but is quite tedious to use as the formula requires summing an infinite amount of regularized gamma functions. I would like to find a way to get rid of the summation .I see the gamma function with powers which reminds me of the summation definition of a hypergeometric function. I would even like to see the use of a generalized hypergeometric function like Meijer G or Kampé de Fériet functions seen in the link. Please correct me and give me feedback!
\left(x\right)rather than just(x). Using\leftand\rightis needed to make(and)grow to the size of the things they enclose, but has no effect when onlyxis enclosed. – Michael Hardy Aug 01 '21 at 18:05