-4

The actual answer of this is e^-8 .But why do i get the answer as 1 when i evaluate the following limit like this - enter image description here

4 Answers4

2

Your proof is wrong in going from line 2 to line 3. You say you are just using the "algebra of limits" there, but that is not true.

The algebra of limits says if $f,g$ have limits $L,M$ at $a,$ then $\lim_{x\to a}(f(x)+g(x)) = L+M,$ $\lim_{x\to a}(f(x)g(x)) =LM,$ etc. Which of these basic results allows us to go from line 2 to line 3?

Here's something to consider: Line 2, after some simplifying, is

$$\tag 1 \left (\frac{(1+u)^{1/u}}{e}\right )^{16/\sin u}.$$

As you may recall, $(1+u)^{1/u}/e<1$ for small positive $u.$ And $16/\sin u$ is huge for small positive $u.$ So we're taking something in $(0,1)$ and raising it to a very large power. It's not surprising that the answer turns out to be a number less than $1.$

On to the desired limit: It's good to recall logarithms are wonderful things in this kind of context. So apply $\ln$ to $(1)$ to get

$$\frac{16}{\sin u}\left (\frac{1}{u}\ln (1+u)-1\right ).$$

Now Taylor tells us $\ln(1+u)=u-u^2/2 +O(u^3)$ as $u\to 0.$ A little bit of work then shows the above equals

$$\frac{1}{\sin u}\left (-8u + O(u^2)\right )=-8\frac{u}{\sin u} + \frac{O(u^2)}{\sin u}.$$

The limit of this as $u\to 0$ is $-8\cdot 1+0=-8.$ Exponentiating back gives $e^{-8}$ for the desired limit.

zhw.
  • 107,943
0

When you take a limit of an expression, you can't take the limit of just a part of the expression (such as the numerator) and leave the rest of the expression the same. That seems to be what you did in the third line.

To see why this is wrong, just consider this example: $$\lim_{x \to 0}\frac{x}{x}$$ If I just take the limit in the numerator only, I get $$\lim_{x\to 0} \frac{0}{x}$$ Obviously these are not equal - the first one is 1 and the second is 0.

Ted
  • 35,732
  • No basically the second one is not lim x->0 0/x. It is lim x->0 (->0/x) .What i did while evaluating the limit was just applying algebra of limits – Raghav Madan Jun 13 '21 at 20:52
  • 2
    The algebra of limits requires that you take all limits simultaneously. That is not what you did. You took a limit of part of the expression in the numerator and left everything else the same. That's the same error as what I showed above in a simplified way. – Ted Jun 13 '21 at 20:53
  • Doesn't the algebra of limits in the case of a quotient assume the limit of the denominator is not $0?$ – zhw. Aug 30 '21 at 23:23
0

You made a mistake when you wrote that

$$(1+x)^{\frac{16}{x\sin(x)}}=$$

$$e^{\frac{16}{x\sin(x)}\ln(1+x)}\sim e^{\frac{16}{\sin(x)}}$$

because $\ln(1+x)\sim x$.

In fact we have

$$e^{f(x)}\sim e^{g(x)}\iff \lim (f(x)-g(x))=0$$

-1

The expression whose limit you want to calculate is:

$\lim_{n\to 0}\Big(\frac{(1+n)^{2/n}}{e^{2}}\Big)^{\frac{8}{sin(n)}}$.

$\lim_{n\to 0}\Big(e^{\frac{-1}{sin(n)}}(n+1)^{\frac{1}{n.sin(n)}}\Big)^{16}$,

$=(e^{-1/2)})^{16}=e^{-8}$