2

(a) Find a function $f:\Bbb R \to \Bbb R$ which is discontinuous at $1,\frac 12,\frac 13, ... $ but is continuous at every other point.

(b) Find a function $f:\Bbb R \to \Bbb R$ which is discontinuous at $1,\frac 12,\frac 13, ... $and $0$ but is continuous at every other point.

Jhwana
  • 535
  • 4
    Did you try something? Did you get stuck? – Asaf Karagila Apr 20 '13 at 21:36
  • @AsafKaragila: $f(x) = \begin{cases} 1 & if,x=\frac 1q \in (0, 1] where,, q\in \Bbb N\ 0 & if,x, otherwise\end{cases} $ , but I feel there is somthing wrong – Jhwana Apr 20 '13 at 21:40
  • 1
    @Fayz : your $f$ satisfies (b). You can modify that $f$ so it satisfies (a). – Stefan Smith Apr 20 '13 at 21:43
  • @AsafKaragila: I think my $f$ is continuous at $0$.. could u explain why is it satisfy (b)? – Jhwana Apr 20 '13 at 21:48
  • 3
    @Fayz If $f$ is continuous at a point $c$, then any sequence ${x_n}$ that tends to $c$ will satisfy $f(x_n)\to f(c)$. But $f(1/n) = 1\to 1$ as $n\to\infty$, and if we have a sequence ${\xi_n}$ of irrational numbers that tends to $0$, $f(\xi_n) = 0\to 0$ as $n\to\infty$, so $f$ is not continuous at $0$. – Stahl Apr 20 '13 at 21:52
  • (-1) in repudiation to "SOLVE THIS FOR ME" questions – leo Jun 03 '13 at 02:56

4 Answers4

16

I am personally fond of $$f(x)=\left\lfloor \frac 1 x\right\rfloor^{-1}$$

for $0< x\leq 1$ and zero elsewhere.

This is discontinuous at every $n^{-1}$ but continuous at zero.

To make it disccontinuous at zero, just ask that $f(0)=1$, and you're done. Here's "full" plot of the function over $[-1,1]$. Note, however, it is undefined at $x=0$.

enter image description here


ADD There is a very nice way of constructing, given a sequence $\{x_n\}$ of real numbers, a function which is continuous everywhere except the elements of $\{x_n\}$. Let $\{c_n\}$ by any nonnegative summable sequence, and let $$s(x)=\sum_{x_n<x} c_n$$

What we do is sum through the indices that satisfy the said inequality. Because of absolute convergence, order is irrelevant. The function is monotone increasing because the terms are nonnegative, and $s$ is discontinuous at each $x_n$ because $$s(x_n^+)-s(x_n^-)=c_n$$

However, it is continuous at any other $x$: see xzyzyz's proof with the particular case $c_n=n^{-2}$. In fact, this function is lower continous, in the sense $f(x^-)=f(x)$ for any value of $x$. If we had used $x_n\leq x$, it would be upper continuous, but still discontinuous at the $x_n$.

To see the function has the said jumps, note that for $h>0$, we have $$\begin{align}\lim_{h\to 0^+} s(x_k+h)-s(x_k-h)&=\lim_{h\to 0^+}\sum_{x_n<x_k+h} c_n-\sum_{x_n<x_k-h}c_n\\&=\lim_{h\to 0^+}\sum_{x_k-h\leq x_n<x_k+h} c_n\end{align}$$

and we can take $\delta$ so small that whenever $0<h<\delta$, for any given $x_m\neq x_k$, $x_m\notin [x_k-\delta,x_k+\delta)$, so the only term that will remain will be $c_k$, as desired.

Pedro
  • 125,149
  • 19
  • 236
  • 403
13

Let $\{a_n\}_{n \in \mathbb{N}}$ be any sequence of real numbers. The function $f(x) = \sum_{a_n \in (-\infty, x]} \frac{1}{n^2}$ is continuous everywhere apart from $a_n$.

This definition is a bit tricky, so let me explain the notation. Pick $x \in \mathbb{R}$. Let $S_x = \{n \in \mathbb{N}: a_n \in (-\infty, x])$. Then $f(x) = \sum_{n \in S_x} \frac{1}{n^2}$.

Let $x = a_k$ for some $k$. As $f$ is obviously increasing, it's easy to see that for $y < x$, $f(x) - f(y) \geq \frac{1}{k^2}$, so $f$ is not continuous at $x$.

If $x$ is not element of sequence $\{a_n\}$, in the definition of $f(x)$ we actually take sum over $a_n \in (-\infty, x)$ instead of $a_n \in (-\infty, x]$, so for $y < x$, we have $f(x) - f(y) = \sum_{a_n \in (y, x)} \frac{1}{n^2}$. Pick any $\epsilon > 0$. Since $\sum \frac{1}{n^2}$ is convergent, pick $N > 0$ large enough so that $\sum_{n > N} \frac{1}{n^2} < \epsilon$. Next, pick $z < x$ so that that for $n \leq N$, $a_n \not \in (z, x)$. Thus for every $y \in (z, x)$, $|f(x) - f(y)| = \sum_{a_n \in (y, x)} \frac{1}{n^2} \leq \sum_{n > N} \frac{1}{n^2} < \epsilon$.

Similarly, one can show that $f$ is continuous on the right at every $x \in \mathbb{R}$ (even for $x \in \{a_n\}$). Together, this implies that $f$ is discontinuous at $\{a_n\}$ and continuous everywhere else.

xyzzyz
  • 7,884
  • I will upvote this when my vote limit wears off. It is weird it has no upvotes. – Pedro Apr 20 '13 at 23:28
  • Isn't this function everywhere discontinuous if ${a_n}$ is an enumeration of the rationals? – Aphyd Aug 18 '19 at 06:56
  • No, it's only discontinuous at all rationals and continuous at all irrationals. Yes, this might be hard to get a feel of. – xyzzyz Aug 19 '19 at 07:37
9

Hint: Try the functions $$f(x)=\begin{cases}x^2&:x=1/n,n\in\Bbb N\\ 0&:o.w.\end{cases}\quad\text{and}\quad g(x)=\begin{cases}1&:x=1/n,n\in\Bbb N\\ 0&:o.w.\end{cases}$$for $(a)$ and $(b)$ respectively.

Clayton
  • 25,087
  • 7
  • 60
  • 115
1

I think the function

$$f(x)=\begin{cases}0&,\;\;x\neq\frac{1}{n}\\{}\\1&,\;\;x=\frac{1}{n}\end{cases}\;\;,\;\;\;n\in\Bbb N$$

does the trick for (b).

As for (a):

$$g(x)=\begin{cases}1&,\;\;x\neq\frac{1}{n}\\{}\\\frac{n-1}{n}&,\;\;x=\frac{1}{n}\end{cases}\;\;,\;\;\;n\in\Bbb N$$

DonAntonio
  • 214,715