I am trying to picture the characteristic projections of
$$\dfrac{\partial u}{\partial t}+u^2\dfrac{\partial u}{\partial x}=0 \text{ with }x\in\mathbb{R} \text{ and } t>0$$ with the initial data $$u(x,0)=\begin{cases} 1 & x<0 \\ (x-1)^2(2x+1) & 0\leq x\leq 1 \\ 0 & x>1 \end{cases}$$
Then I want the blow up time. Do I need to solve the equation to find the blow up time? For the characteristic projections, parametrise $x\equiv x(t)$
$$\frac{du}{dt}=0, \frac{dx}{dt}=u^2(x,t)$$
The solution is constant along characteristic projectons, with respect to $t$, so I can trace back to the initial curve (usually called $\Gamma$?) setting $x(0)=0$ (am I allowed to do this?)
$$x=(u(x,0))^2=\begin{cases} t & x<0 \\ (x-1)^4(2x+1)^2t & 0\leq x\leq 1 \\ 0 & x>1 \end{cases}$$
When I integrated $\frac{dx}{dt}$ I assumed $u^2(x,t)=u_0(x)$, is this the correct thing to do also? The characteristic projections are quite obvious for either side of the interval $[0,1]$ they are simply the family of curves with $\frac{dx}{dt}=1$ on the left and $\frac{dx}{dt}=0$ (vertical) on the right. I am unsure how to draw the projections elsewhere.
Next the condition for the blow-up is $t=-\frac{1}{F'(x)}$ where $x=F(x)t$ are the characteristic projections. I think that it is when the second derivative of these projections is such that the curves are concave because then they intersect at some point and behave badly. $F''(x)>0$ for $x\in(0,\frac{1}{2}]$ so to find the first blow-up time I need to find the smallest value for $$t=-\frac{1}{F'(x)}=-\frac{1}{12 (x-1)^3 x (1+2 x)}$$ Differentiate; $\frac{dt}{dx}=\frac{10 x^2-1}{12 (x-1)^4 x^2 (2x+1)^2}$ the extreme value is found to be $x=\frac{1}{\sqrt{10}}\in(0,\frac{1}{2}]$ this gives a value $$t=\frac{25 \left(25+34 \sqrt{10}\right)}{6561}$$
I am then asked to show that the solution blows up for a value which turns out to to be around $t=0.527$, slightly higher than $t=0.505$ (above), so can I say that the solution blows up for a time earlier than this, hence it blows up for $t=0.527$ also? Is there a better way to show that a solution blows up for a given time, $t$?
