In Pearl's Causality - Models, Reasoning and Inference (2009), he defines d-separation as follows:
Let $X\perp\!\!\!\perp Y |Z$ mean "$Z$ d-separates $X$ from $Y$".
But there seems to be a weird edge case that satisfies this criterion, but actually shouldn't: We can have a situation where $X\subset Z$. E.g. imagine the case where $X=Z=\{V\}$, and $Y=\{W\}$.
Then we want that $X\perp\!\!\!\perp Y |Z$ holds, because we want $X\perp\!\!\!\perp Y |Z$ to coincide with the probabilistic notion of conditional independence, and clearly $X$ and $Y$ are conditionally independent given $X$. However, consider a simple graph consisting of nodes $\{V,W\}$, with an edge $V\to W$. Here, the path between $V$ and $W$ is not blocked, $X$ and $Y$ are not d-separated.
What am I missing here?

