This series converges conditionally, but it's quite slow. I would like to find its value with high accuracy:
$$S=\sum_{n=3}^\infty (-1)^n (1-n^{1/n})$$
Wolfram Alpha gives $S \approx 0.226354\ldots$.
Since the terms decrease monotonely in absolute value, we can apply an approximate estimation:
$$S_N= \sum_{n=3}^{N-1} (-1)^n (1-n^{1/n})+ \frac{1}{2} (-1)^N (1-N^{1/N})$$
$$S_{100}=0.22644\ldots$$
$$S_{101}=0.22626\ldots$$
$$\frac{S_{100}+S_{101}}{2} =0.22635473854439942\ldots$$
Another way could be to transform the series, for example:
$$n^{1/n}=\exp \frac{\log n}{n}=\sum_{k=0}^\infty \frac{\log^k n}{n^k k!}$$
Which gives us (assuming we are allowed to change the order of summation):
$$S=\sum_{k=1}^\infty \frac{1}{k!} \sum_{n=3}^\infty (-1)^{n+1} \frac{\log^k n}{n^k}=\sum_{k=1}^\infty \frac{S_k}{k!}$$
The inner series $S_k>0$ can be expressed in terms of repeated derivatives of the zeta function, which don't have a closed form for $k \geq 2$, but the series can still be evaluated numerically with high accuracy.
Note
$$S_1=\frac{\log 2}{2} (1+\log 2-2\gamma)$$
For $k \geq 2$ we can easily write:
$$S_k=\sum_{q=1}^\infty \frac{\log^k (2q+1)}{(2q+1)^k}-\sum_{q=2}^\infty \frac{\log^k (2q)}{(2q)^k}$$
Both the series converge absolutely and can be easily approximated by Euler-Maclaurin summation with all the integrals and derivatives expressed in closed form (obviously for large $k$ it becomes unwieldy).
Evaluating the series up to $S_6$ we obtain:
$$S > 0.2263538 \ldots$$
Still not that good.
Finally, we could use Euler-Maclaurin, but I'm not sure how to apply it in this case, especially how to deal with the integral.
It looks like I got very lucky with MRB. A lot of people like you and Richard Crandall have taken note of its existence and properties!!!!!
– Marvin Ray Burns Jul 22 '19 at 22:34