2

Let $C$ be the category of finitely generated abelian groups. If $M$ is a finitely generated abelian group, then define its dual as $M^* = \operatorname{Hom}(M,\mathbb{Q}/\mathbb{Z})$.

Now I want to show that $M$ and $M^{**}$ are canonically isomorphic.

I know that we need to use the structure theorem of abelian groups, but don't get how to use it to show isomorphisam.

user26857
  • 53,190
  • What you want to show is not true. It is true that $M$ is canonically isomorphic to $M^{*}$ for finite* abelian groups $M$, but not for infinite, finitely generated abelian groups. – Jeremy Rickard Apr 22 '23 at 23:27

2 Answers2

2

The statement should be about finite abelian groups as Jeremy Rickard remarks.

The structure theorem tells you that $M$ is a direct sum of finite cyclic groups. Thus you are reduced to prove the statement for a finite cyclic group.

Can you prove it for $M=\mathbb{Z}/n\mathbb{Z}$?


In the previous part it is taken for granted the existence of a canonical homomorphism $M\to M^{**}$, which exists in a much more general context. If $A$ is any commutative ring and $K$ is a fixed $A$-module, we can define $M^*=\operatorname{Hom}_A(M,K)$ and a canonical homomorphism $M\to M^{**}$ is easy to define like for vector spaces. The task here is to prove that

  1. the homomorphism is injective when $A=\mathbb{Z}$ and $K=\mathbb{Q}/\mathbb{Z}$;

  2. the homomorphism is surjective when $M$ is a finite abelian group.

Note that 1 holds for any abelian group (because $\mathbb{Q}/\mathbb{Z}$ is a cogenerator. Instead 2 doesn't hold generally, but it does for finitely generated modules using, as hinted, the structure theorem.

egreg
  • 244,946
  • @mathsstudent Much more is true: if $C$ is a finite cyclic group, then there is a unique subgroup of $\mathbb{Q}/\mathbb{Z}$ isomorphic to $C$. – egreg Feb 05 '19 at 10:09
  • $\mathbb{Z}^{**}$ is not isomorphic to $\mathbb{Z}$, but to the profinite completion of $\mathbb{Z}$ (see for example this post.). So the statement is not true unless $M$ is finite. – Jeremy Rickard Apr 22 '23 at 23:32
  • @JeremyRickard You’re perfecly right, of course. Fixed. – egreg Apr 23 '23 at 07:09
0

Saying that $M$ and $M^{**}$ are \emph{canonically} isomorphic means that the ismorphism $\phi :M\rightarrow M^{**}$ is constructed in a natural way, without any choice of basis or an identification of $M$ with a product of cyclic groups. Then the structure theorem can be used to prove that $\phi$ is an isomorphism, but the construction should not rely on the presenting $M$ as a product of cyclic groups.

The isomorphism $\phi :M\rightarrow M^{**}$ is as follows. $\phi(g) : M^* \rightarrow \mathbb{Q}/\mathbb{Z}$ sends $\eta \in M^*$ to \begin{equation} \phi(g)\eta=\eta(g) \end{equation} To prove that $\phi$ is an isomorphism you first use the structure theorem, thus you present $M$ as a product of cyclic groups, and you know that $\mathbb{Z}_N^*\cong \mathbb{Z}_N$ (you just send $x\in \mathbb{Z}_N$ to $\chi_x\in \mathbb{Z}_N^*$ given by $\chi_x(y)=\frac{xy}{N}$). Thus it is enough to prove that $\phi$ is injective. Suppose $\phi(g)=1$. This means that for any $\eta \in M^*$ $$ \eta(g)=1 $$ which implies $g=1$. Indeed $g\neq 1$, then let $n>1$ be the order of $g$, and we have $$ \left\{g^k \ | \ k=0,...,n-1\right\} \cong \mathbb{Z}_n $$ and with the same map used above to show that $\mathbb{Z}_N^*\cong \mathbb{Z}_N$ we see that there are elements $\eta \in M^*$ acting non-trivially on $g$, contradicting $\phi(g)=1$.

  • 1
    You're misunderstanding what I wrote. I don't use the structure theorem for proving the existence of the canonical homomorphism: given any commutative ring $A$ and a fixed module $K$, if we define $M^=\operatorname{Hom}_A(M,K)$, then it is straightforward to define a canonical map $M\to M^{*}$. But I'll add it. – egreg Apr 22 '23 at 16:48