Let $\mathbb{R}^{1,n}$ denote Lorentzian $n$-space, i.e., $\mathbb{R}^n$ equipped with the Lorentzian inner product $$\langle x,y \rangle = - x_0 y_0 + x_1 y_1 + \cdots + x_n y_n.$$
Define $\mathbb{H}^n : = \left \{ \xi \in \mathbb{R}^{1,n} : \langle \xi, \xi \rangle = -1, \ \xi_0 > 0 \right \}$ to be hyperbolic $n$-space. I have been battling with the following seemingly standard/trivial exercises in Jöst's Riemannian Geometry and Geometric Analysis and have had little success:
5) Show that $\langle \cdot, \cdot \rangle$ induces a Riemannian metric on the tangent spaces $T_p \mathbb{H}^n \subset T_p \mathbb{R}^{n+1}$ for $p \in \mathbb{H}^n$.
6) Let $s = (-1, 0, ..., 0) \in \mathbb{R}^{n+1}$, and define $$f(x) = s - \frac{2(x-s)}{\langle x-s, x-s \rangle}.$$ Show that $f : \mathbb{H}^n \longrightarrow \{ \xi \in \mathbb{R}^n : | \xi | < 1 \}$ is a diffeomorphism, and that in this chart, the metric assumes the form $$\frac{4}{(1 - | \xi |^2)^2} d\xi_i \otimes d\xi_i.$$
Thoughts/Progress:
The fact that $\langle \cdot, \cdot \rangle$ defines an inner product is clear, but I cannot convince myself that $\langle \cdot, \cdot \rangle$ is positive definite. For Q6., I am aware that a similar question has been posted on here, but the solution is not clear to me.
Note that I do not want answers to these problems, just guidance.
Thanks in advance.