I understand that the Maximum Modulus Principle works, but I'm a little baffled as to why. To be more precise, the picture I have in my head is something like this: for a compact set $K \subset \mathbb{C}$, since $|f|$ (for $f$ holomorphic) can only attain its maximum on the boundary $\partial K$, if you consider a disk centered on the origin, no matter what value $|f|$ obtains on the boundary of this disc, you can just increase the radius of the disc a little bit and find a higher value of $|f|$; in other words, the absolute value of function just keeps growing without bound. What exactly is driving/forcing this growth?
I'm looking for some kind of explanation, geometric or otherwise, that could aid my intuition. In particular, why does $\mathbb{C}$ behave so differently from $\mathbb{R}$ here?
EDIT. In response to the "duplicate" tag: I am looking for something a little deeper than the answers there. As mentioned above, an explanation of the difference in behaviours of $\mathbb{C}$ and $\mathbb{R}$ in this regard, perhaps with a tie-in to the Cauchy-Riemann equations...it seems like there's something that causes functions to behave fundamentally differently over $\mathbb{C}$, and I would like to understand why, with the Maxiumum Modulus Principle as a concrete example.