9

Prove the identity by induction: $$ F_{2n} = F_n L_n, $$ where $F_n$ and $L_n$ are the $n^{th}$ Fibonacci and Lucas number, respectively.

I have an answer but am not happy with it since it doesn't use induction. I resorted to using the identity $F_{2n} = F_{n + 1}^2 - F_{n - 1}^2$, which, admittedly, was not given to me in the text. I am, however, allowed to use the relations: $L_n = L_{n - 1} + L_{n - 2}$, $L_n = F_{n + 1} + F_{n - 1}$, and $F_{n + 1}^2 - F_n F_{n + 2} = (-1)^n$, since I proved them earlier.

So far I have shown the base cases of $n = 1, 2$, and have that $$ F_{n + 1} L_{n + 1} = F_n L_n + F_{n - 1} L_{n - 1} + F_{n - 1} L_n + F_n L_{n - 1} = F_{2n} + F_{2n - 2} + F_{n - 1} L_n + F_n L_{n - 1}, $$ so if I could show $F_{n - 1} L_n + F_n L_{n - 1} = 2 F_{2n - 1}$, then I would be done, but no such luck. I am trying to only use induction, no combinatorial arguments or other identities (such as Binet). Thank you in advance!

Chris Culter
  • 27,415
tylerc0816
  • 4,243
  • 1
    I know you said that you don't want the Binet formula, but it yields an extremely quick way to see why the result is true - $ \frac {\phi^{2n} - \phi^{-2n} } {2\sqrt{5}} = \frac {\phi^{n} - \phi^{-n}}{2 \sqrt{5} } \times ( \phi^{n} + \phi^{-n})$. It is also provides the motivation for finding related formulas, like the other one that N.S. gave in his solution. – Calvin Lin Dec 30 '12 at 00:57
  • 1
    Are you using strong induction? Since you assumed the identity true for $n-1$ as well? – Airdish Jul 10 '16 at 04:03

3 Answers3

9

Try to prove both relations at once using induction:

$$F_{2n} = F_n L_n \,,\mbox{and}, \, F_{n - 1} L_n + F_n L_{n - 1} = 2 F_{2n - 1}$$

N. S.
  • 134,609
  • 1
    How do we solve both at once? When I try to prove the first one by induction, I end up having to prove the second one. When I try to prove the second one by induction, my expression reduces to the first one. Can you please help me? I will be very grateful for your help. – Pumpkin_Star Oct 17 '24 at 15:00
  • @Pumpkin_Star Both, not the first one...Your P(n) is both statements – N. S. Oct 17 '24 at 15:12
  • How do we do that? I have never done that before – Pumpkin_Star Oct 17 '24 at 15:23
  • Again, write $P(n)$ as the displayed relation. – N. S. Oct 17 '24 at 20:23
4

My guess is that you're working on exercise 15 of section 1-1 of George Andrew's Number Theory book. If so, that's exactly what I've done. All exercices of this section make only use of material exposed in the book, except this one, which is trickier. And indeed, I've tried hard to solve it by induction, without much success. So I look up on the internet, ending up on your question :) After some further search the formula (with any $m>1$) :

$F_{m+n} = F_{m+1}F_n + F_mF_{n-1}$

can actually be proven by induction (on $n$), use :

$F_{m+(n+1)} = F_{m+n} + F_{m + (n-1)}$

If you take $m=n$, then :

$F_{n+n} = F_{2n} = F_{n+1}F_n + F_nF_{n-1}=F_nL_n$

And voila, you've got your proof by induction :)

My guess is that George Andrew's goal was for us to prove the special case with $m=n$, without knowing that there's actually a more general formula. However that proof has no "obvious" relationship with Lucas numbers.

0

Here's an approach using telescoping sums and strong induction. Since by definition the Fibonacci numbers satisfy $F_{k+1} = F_{k} + F_{k-1}$, if we combine this with $L_k = F_{k+1} + F_{k-1}$ we get $\require{cancel}$ $$ L_k F_k = \left( F_{k+1} + F_{k-1}\right)\left( F_{k+1} - F_{k-1}\right) = F^2_{k+1} - F^2_{k-1} \tag{1} $$ so the problem becomes equivalent to showing $F_{2n} = F^2_{n+1} - F^2_{n-1} $, and this is the statement that we'll prove.

Recalling again that $F_k = F_{k+1} - F_{k-1}$ we see that \begin{align} 1 + \sum_{i=1}^{n} F_{2i}& = 1 + \sum_{i=1}^{n} \left(F_{2i+1}- F_{2i-1} \right) \\ &= \cancel{1} + \color{blue}{F_{2n+1}} + \sum_{i=1}^{\color{blue}{n-1}} F_{2i+1}- \cancel{\color{purple}{F_{2-1}}} - \sum_{j=\color{purple}{2}}^{n}F_{2j-1} \\ & \overset{\color{green}{j \to j+1}}{=} F_{2n+1} + \cancel{\sum_{i =1}^{n-1} F_{2i+1}}- \cancel{\sum_{j=\color{green}{1}}^{\color{green}{n-1}}F_{\color{green}{2j+1}}}\\ &= F_{2n+2} - F_{2n} \tag{2} \end{align} We now proceed by strong induction. The base case is readily checked. For the inductive step we assume that $F_{2i} = F^2_{i+1} - F^2_{i-1}$ for all $i =1,2, \dots, n-1$. Then \begin{align*} F_{2n} &\overset{(2)}{=} 1 + F_{2(n-1)} + \sum_{i=1}^{n-1}F_{2i}\\ & = 1 + F^2_{n} - F^2_{n-2}+ \sum_{i=1}^{n-1}\left(F^2_{i+1} - F^2_{i-1}\right)\\ & =\cancel{ 1 }+ F^2_{n} - F^2_{n-2} + \color{blue}{F^2_{n}}+ \color{blue}{F^2_{n-1}} +\sum_{i=1}^{\color{blue}{n-3}}F^2_{i+1} - \underbrace{\color{purple}{F^2_0}}_{0} - \cancel{\color{purple}{F^2_1 }} - \sum_{j=\color{purple}{3}}^{n-1}F^2_{j-1}\\ & \overset{\color{green}{j \to j+2}}{=} 2F^2_{n} + F^2_{n-1} - F^2_{n-2} + \cancel{\sum_{i=1}^{n-3}F^2_{i+1}} - \cancel{\sum_{j=\color{green}{1}}^{\color{green}{n-3}} F^2_{\color{green}{j+1}}} \end{align*} So we've reduced the problem to showing that $2F^2_{n} + F^2_{n-1} - F^2_{n-2} = F^2_{n+1}- F^2_{n-1}$. Recalling once more that $\color{red}{F_{k+1} = F_k + F_{k-1}}$ we obtain \begin{align*} 2F^2_{n} + F^2_{n-1} - F^2_{n-2} & = 2\left(F_{n+1} - F_{n-1} \right)^2 + F^2_{n-1} - \left(\color{red}{F_{n}} - F_{n-1} \right)^2\\ & = 2\left(F_{n+1} - F_{n-1} \right)^2 + F^2_{n-1} - \left(\color{red}{F_{n+1} - F_{n-1}} - F_{n-1} \right)^2\\ & = 2\left(F_{n+1} - F_{n-1} \right)^2 + F^2_{n-1} - \left(F_{n+1} - 2F_{n-1} \right)^2\\ & = 2F^2_{n+1} - \cancel{4 F_{n+1} F_{n-1}} + 2 F^2_{n-1} + F^2_{n-1} - F^2_{n+1} +\cancel{4 F_{n+1}F_{n-1}} - 4F_{n-1}^2\\ & = F^2_{n+1}- F^2_{n-1} \end{align*} as desired.

Robert Lee
  • 7,654