While attempting to characterize primes of the form $2n^2+10n+15\,$ I discovered
If $\,f(n)=2n^2+10n+15\,$ is prime then $\,f(n)\equiv 7\pmod{\!36}$
I am interested in proving or disproving this .
Attempt: So, I know that we have to have $n\equiv 2\pmod 3$, because, if $n\equiv 1\pmod 3$ then $2n^2+10n+15\equiv 2*1^2+10*1+15\equiv 2+10+15 \equiv 27\equiv 0 \pmod 3$, which is impossible since $p$ can only be divisible by itself and $1$ which would mean that $p=3$, but $p$ is obviously larger than $3$. If $n\equiv 0\pmod 3$, then $2n^2+10n+15\equiv 2*0+10*0+15\equiv15\equiv0\pmod3$, so again we have that a prime number not equal to 3 is divisible by 3, which is impossible, so our only case left is $n\equiv 2\pmod 3$. But I'm stuck here, and I don't think it's that helpful.