1

I read here : When is the closure of an open ball equal to the closed ball? and here : closed ball in euclidean space that in $(\mathbb{R}^n, d)$, which is Euclidean Space with the standard metric, the closure of an open ball is equal to the closed ball.

But pick a point $x \in \mathbb{R}^n$, and consider the open ball around $x$ of radius $0$, that is $\Phi = B_{(\mathbb{R}^n, d)}(x, 0) = \{y \in \mathbb{R}^n \ | \ d(x, y) < 0\} = \emptyset$. Now compare that to the closed ball around $x$ of radius $0$, which is $\Gamma = B_{(\mathbb{R}^n, d)}(x, 0) = \{y \in \mathbb{R}^n \ | \ d(x, y) \leq 0\} = \{x\}$.

Based on the answers in the questions above, we should have $\overline{\Phi} = \Gamma$ however we have $\overline{\Phi} =\Phi = \emptyset \neq \Gamma = \{x\}$, contradicting the answers above, so what am I missing here?

Perturbative
  • 13,656

1 Answers1

3

You should exclude $0$ as a radius. Defining $B(x,r) =\{y: d(x,y) < r\}$ and $D(x,r) = \{y: d(x,y) \le r\}$ for $r>0$, in any metric space, we can easily prove that for all $r>0$:

$$\overline{B(x,r)} \subseteq D(x,r)$$

with equality holding in e.g. all metrics derived from norms in a vector space, of which the Euclidean distance is an example. In general metric spaces the inclusion can be proper, and if we do allow $r=0$, it's always proper for that "radius".

Henno Brandsma
  • 250,824