4

Let $x_n$ be a sequence in a uniformly convex Banach space $E$ such that $x_n \to x$ weakly in $E$ and $\|x_n\|_E \to \|x\|_E$. Then $x_n \to x$ strongly in $E$.

To show this by contradiction a proof I'm reading states that first we suppose that (for the non-trivial $x\neq 0$ case) $$ \limsup_{n\to \infty} \|x_n-x\|>0. $$ Then there exists a subsequence $x_{n_k}$ such that $$ \lim_{n\to \infty} \|x_{n_k}-x\|=\ell>0. $$ My question is how can we say there exists such a subsequence that converges to a finite number? I don't see anything in the assumptions that gives us this?

Ron Ronson
  • 563
  • 3
  • 12
  • 1
    This is a property of the real line, not $E$. If the limit supremum of your sequence is finite, then there is an upper bound on all of the terms beyond some index $N$. Any bounded sequence in $\mathbb{R}$ has a convergent subsequence. In particular, if the limit supremum exists, then we can choose a subsequence that converges to the limit supremum. – Michael L. Sep 28 '17 at 14:45

2 Answers2

5

The point at which you seem to have a question is not about Banach spaces; it's about sequences of real numbers. You have a sequence $\{a_n\}_{n=1}^\infty$ of real numbers for which $$ \limsup_{n\to\infty} a_n >0 $$ and the question is: how does this imply that there is a subsequence $\{a_{n_k}\}_{k=1}^\infty$ for which $$ \lim_{k\to\infty} a_{n_k} = \ell>0. $$ If you have $\limsup_{n\to\infty} a_n = \ell>0,$ then how do you show there is a subsequence converging to $\ell\text{?}$

First approach: Apply the definition of $\limsup:$ $$ \limsup_{n\to\infty} a_n = \inf\left\{ \sup\{a_n,a_{n+1},a_{n+2}, a_{n+3}, \ldots\} : n\in\{1,2,3,\ldots\} \right\} = \ell >0. $$ This means every number $h<\ell$ fails to be a lower bound of the sequence $$ \Big\{ \sup\{a_n,a_{n+1},a_{n+2}, \ldots\} \Big\}_{n=1}^\infty. $$ Failure of $h$ to be a lower bound of this sequence means some member of this sequence is $>h.$ Thus we have $$ \forall h<\ell\ \exists n\ \sup\{a_n,a_{n+1},a_{n+2},\ldots\} > h. $$ Just let $n_k$ be some index $\ge n$ for which $a_{n_k}>h.$

Second approach: Relying on a definition of $\limsup,$ show that $\limsup_{n\to\infty} a_n = \ell$ if and only if $\ell$ is the largest of all limits of subsequences of $\{a_n\}_{n=1}^\infty.$ That implies there is some subsequence converging to $\ell.$

  • Related answer: https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/493526/can-someone-clearly-explain-about-the-lim-sup-and-lim-inf/493650#493650 – Michael Hardy Sep 28 '17 at 15:00
3

Since $\|x_n\| \to \|x\|$ it follows that the real sequence $\{ \|x_n-x\|\}_{n\geq 1}$ is bounded which implies that the $\limsup_{n\to \infty} \|x_n-x\|$ is finite. Then the existence of the subsequence $\{x_{n_k}\}_{k\geq 1}$ follows from the definition of $\limsup$ (for a sequence of real numbers).

Robert Z
  • 147,345