I forgot the theorem's name, but "it" states that $V$ can be expressed as a product (well, not soundly formulated, but the reader might know what is meant)
$$V = [a_1(x_2, ..., x_n), b_1(x_2, ..., x_n)] \times [a_2(x_3, ..., x_n), b_2(x_3, ..., x_n)] \times \cdots \times [a_n, b_n]$$
Let $\vec x_k := (x_k, ..., x_n)$, $f_1(\vec x_1) := f(\vec x)$ and
$$f_{k+1}(\vec x_{k+1}) := \int\limits_{a_k(\vec x_{k+1})}^{b_k(\vec x_{k+1})} \sqrt{1 + (\partial_kf_k(\vec x_k))^2}\, dx_k\quad \text{for}\quad k \ge 1.$$
Then $f_n$ is the sought hyperarcsurfacevolumething quantity: $f_{k+1}$ integrates over the $x_k$-direction in an arc-length sense, so after this arc-length-integration over all directions, the sought hypersurface is obtained.
From now on let's drop the variable and shorten $\partial_l f_k(\vec x_k) =: f_{k,l}$ and $f_k' := f_{k,k}$. Then by definition,
$$f_{k+1, l} = \sqrt{1+f_k'^2}\Big|_{a_{k,l}}^{b_{k,l}} + \int_{a_k}^{b_k} \frac{f_k' f_{k,l}'}{\sqrt{1+f_k'^2}} \,dx_k$$
and so on - this is getting messy, isn't it?
At first I thought this simplifies to
$$f_n = \int_V \sqrt{1 + \Big|\vec\nabla f(\vec x)\Big|^2}\, dx^n$$
but at the moment I am not so sure anymore. This sounds actually more logical than the upper result, and results from using $df_{k+1}^2 := dx_k^2 + df_k^2$ instead - to be continued...