We need to eliminate the pairs that are not coprime to ensure we don't get a contradiction (otherwise no such solution can exist).
To check this, we must ensure that if $x \equiv a \mod{m}$ and $x \equiv b \mod{n}$, then $a \equiv b \mod{\gcd(m,n)}$.
This means that asking that $x \equiv 1 \mod{2}$ and $x \equiv 1 \mod{4}$ is fine since $1 \equiv 1 \mod{2}$, whereas if we required $x \equiv 2 \mod{4}$ instead, then this is not true meaning no such solution can exist.
If these conditions are all compatible then we can get a solution modulo the lowest common multiple of all these numbers.
To do this, note that by Chinese Remainder Theorem (CRT), if $x \equiv a \mod{mn}$, where $\gcd(m,n)=1$, then this is equivalent to requiring that $x \equiv a \mod{m}$ and $x \equiv a \mod{n}$.
Repeating this, we can assume $m$, $n$ are prime powers. If we haven't checked compatibility yet, we can do at this point as it will be quite straightforward. Assuming they are, if we have a congruence condition modulo $p^m$, we can eliminate any other congruence condition modulo $p^n$ for any $n<m$.
Now all our moduli will be coprime and we can now apply CRT again to get a solution (although we may have more equations than we started with).
In your example, splitting each congruence into prime powers we have:
\begin{eqnarray}
&x& \equiv 1 \mod{2}, \\
&x& \equiv 1 \mod{3}, \\
&x& \equiv 1 \mod{4}, \\
&x& \equiv 1 \mod{5}, \\
&x& \equiv 1 \mod{2} \mbox{ and } x \equiv 1 \mod{3}.
\end{eqnarray}
Now we may remove the last line since these conditions already appear. The only other check we need to make is the congruences for $2$ and $4$. Now these are compatible so we remove the first condition. This leaves us with the conditions
\begin{eqnarray}
&x& \equiv 1 \mod{3}, \\
&x& \equiv 1 \mod{4}, \\
&x& \equiv 1 \mod{5}. \\
\end{eqnarray}
Now all the moduli are coprime so by CRT we find the solution is $x \equiv 1 \mod{60}$.