2

Why any smooth map from the 2-sphere to the 2-torus has zero degree? Can we show that there is no surjective smooth map from 2-sphere to 2-torus?

levap
  • 67,610
Zeinab
  • 21
  • 6
    If $f : S^2 \to T^2$ is any continuous map, you can lift it to the universal cover $S^2 \to \Bbb R^2$ as $S^2$ is simply connected. Nullhomotope, and then pushdown to get a nullhomotopy of $f$. Nullhomotopic maps have degree $0$, so you're done. – Balarka Sen Jan 19 '16 at 19:34
  • Related: https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/1068819/map-from-n-sphere-to-n-dimensional-torus – balu Nov 29 '19 at 15:06

1 Answers1

1

Here's a proof in the spirit of Schoen & Yau's 2017 proof of the positive-mass theorem in general dimensions. Schoen & Yau's proof crucially uses (and shows) the following fact:

If $M$ is a compact oriented smooth $n$-manifold (without boundary) and there is a smooth map $F: M \rightarrow T^n$ to the $n$-torus with non-zero degree, then $M$ cannot possibly carry a metric with strictly positive scalar curvature. (In particular, $M$ cannot be a sphere.)

In contrast to the higher-dimensional case, for $n=2$ the proof is easy and answers OP's claim right away:

Suppose $M$ carried a positive scalar curvature metric. Then every connected component of $M$ has total curvature $> 0$ and is thus a topological 2-sphere by Gauß-Bonnet's theorem and the classification of compact 2-surfaces without boundary.

Now consider the form $dx^1 \wedge dx^2$ on $T^2$ where $x^1, x^2$ are canonical coordinates on $T^2 = S^1 × S^1$, normalized such that $\int_{T^2} dx^1 \wedge dx^2 = 1$. Consider the closed 1-forms $\theta^i = F^*(dx^i)$ on $M$ and compute:

$$ \int_M \theta^1 \wedge \theta^2 = \int_M F^*(dx^1 \wedge dx^2) = \operatorname{deg}(F) \int_{T^2} dx^1 \wedge dx^2 = \operatorname{deg}(F) \neq 0 $$

But this means that $\theta^1 \wedge \theta^2$ has non-zero integral on some connected component $S^2$ of $M$.

We will show that the closed 1-forms $\theta^i$ restricted to $S^2$ lie in linearly independent (in particular non-zero) cohomology classes $[\theta^1], [\theta^2]$ of $S^2$. But then $H^1(S^2)$ is at least 2-dimensional, a contradiction since $H^1(S^2) = 0$.

So suppose their cohomology classes were linearly dependent, i.e. $\lambda [\theta^1] = [\theta^2]$ for some $\lambda \in \mathbb{R}\setminus\{0\}$ (without loss of generality). Then $\lambda \theta^1 - \theta^2 = df$ for some function $f$ on $S^2$. Then:

$$ \theta^1 \wedge \theta^2 = \theta^1 \wedge (\lambda^{-1} \theta^1 - df) = 0 - \lambda^{-1} \theta^1 \wedge df = d(\lambda^{-1} f \theta^1) $$

So the 2-form $\theta^1 \wedge \theta^2$ would be exact on $S^2$, so in particular it would have zero integral on $S^2$ by Stokes' theorem – a contradiction.

balu
  • 473
  • Would the downvoter please care to explain their vote? As far as I can see, my post is a perfectly valid answer. – balu Dec 16 '20 at 12:24