Perhaps, this question has been answered already but I am not aware of any existing answer. Is there any international icon or symbol for showing Contradiction or reaching a contradiction in Mathematical contexts? The same story can be seen for showing that someone reached to the end of the proof of a theorem (i.e. as shown the tombstone symbol ∎, Halmos).
12 Answers
I am surprised to see that nobody has mentioned $\bot$. In logic, this is a standard symbol for a formula that is always false, and therefore represents a contradiction exactly.
In almost all logical formalisms, one has a rule of inference that allows one to deduce $p$ from $\bot$ for any $p$ at all, and it is usually possible to prove that $(p\land\lnot p)\to \bot$ and so forth.
- 67,568
- 43
- 308
- 617
-
1This seems like a pretty standard choice, especially when doing proofs about a logical system. The symbols are
\bot($\bot$) and the corresponding\top($\top$) to show tautology. – Benjamin Kuykendall Oct 07 '16 at 01:13 -
This is my favorite answer. What brought me to this post was an impromptu Rorschach test: I came across the symbol $\dashv$ placed at the end of the second-to-last sentence of this proof by contradiction. Having (a) never seen that symbol used to mark the end of a proof before, and (b) never even considered the possibility of - let alone known of - any symbol to mark contradiction, despite its position at the end of the proof of the claim in that answer, my brain's first theory about its meaning was that it must be there to mark contradiction. – mathematrucker Oct 29 '17 at 12:32
-
My favorite for a completely silly reason: "You bot!" is a common youth insult, meaning "Stupid!". Even sillier given that it's the youth group of my chess club, where a bot would spank them even if set at half ELO... – Hauke Reddmann May 12 '20 at 08:05
-
1The problem about uptack is that it's part of the object language. Whereas when we say we've found a contradiction we are making a judgement in a metalanguage. IMO a better alternative would be $\vdash \bot$. – Poscat Sep 27 '23 at 13:26
Different sources use different symbols (if they use symbols at all). I've seen $\Rightarrow\Leftarrow$ most often. For some others, see "Symbolic Representation" here.
- 67,568
- 43
- 308
- 617
- 105,149
-
13I like the \blitza symbol (the first one listed at the link). Apparently, it is commonly used in Germany. I always think it describes the path of a small remote control plane that ends up falling. – Andrés E. Caicedo Jun 18 '12 at 20:42
-
2
-
7
-
13
-
3The ↯ symbol seems to be very common : in France, my first teacher after high school, used this symbol too (since I use it unconsciously). – JBC Jun 19 '12 at 21:24
Some of my teachers and I use something like (Harry Potter's scar) this $\unicode{x21af}$ (LaTex: \unicode{x21af})
- 105
- 1,747
-
3
-
3This is the only contradiction symbol I've been taught with through both gymnasium (high school) and university. So I would say that it is the most common symbol here in Denmark. Only place I've seen other symbols have been in english-language books and on the internet. – Kitalda Mar 05 '17 at 09:04
-
3
-
2@qwertz I believe
\unicode{}is a XeLaTeX specific command. The packagemarvosymhas a\Lightningcommand, that works with PDFLateX and LuaLaTeX. – sesodesa Mar 11 '19 at 17:52 -
Also
\blitzis suggested in the Comprehensive LaTeX symbols list https://www.ctan.org/pkg/comprehensive – Andrestand Mar 11 '21 at 10:50
The symbol I've seen most commonly in mathematical logic statements is also the one which was taught to me in a class called "Discrete Mathematics;" it is something like a sideways number sign or "pound sign" (or "hashtag," as some might call it today).

- 6,691
- 211
-
2
-
1@Anthony Try \def\contra{\tikz[baseline, x=0.22em, y=0.22em, line width=0.032em]\draw (0,2.83)--(2.83,0) (0.71,3.54)--(3.54,0.71) (0,0.71)--(2.83,3.54) (0.71,0)--(3.54,2.83);} – Klint Qinami Sep 25 '16 at 00:05
-
This is in Unicode as U+2A33 ("smash product"), and the
stixandboisikpackages have it as\smashtimes(according to the CLSL). – benrg Apr 22 '22 at 18:03 -
I always had used the following notation. At least in my academic environment this one was suggested and used. You can also see these links
- Wikipedia (The part "Symbolic representation").
- TeX (The first page of the section "3 Mathematical symbols").
They both has brought this symbol among symbols that are common for contradiction. About how to type it in TeX with better size, see this link.
- 3,895
An equivalent to \blitza can be found in the package stmaryrd in math mode via \lightning. Here is another option for the rotated pound sign:
\def\contradict
{
\tikz[baseline, x=0.2em, y=0.2em, line width=0.04em]
\draw (0,0) -- ({4*cos(45)},{4*sin(45)})
(-1,1) -- ({-1 + 4*cos(45)},{1 + 4*sin(45)})
(-1,3) -- ({-1 + 4*cos(315)},{3 + 4*sin(315)})
(0,4) -- ({0 + 4*cos(315)},{4 + 4*sin(315)});
}
And, although I have never seen that as a contradiction symbol, I have seen $\Rightarrow\Leftarrow$ more often, and use it in my teaching. I generally try to avoid double meaning of symbols so in a class not solely for propositional logic I prefer not to use a perpendicular symbol $\perp$ for contradiction.
- 7,297
- 61
-
2I'm not very familiar with
tikzbut I guess your answer is downvoted not due to the content of yourtikzmacro but solely due to the format (because you didn't highlight the codes). I edited as such. Feel free to further improve your post and overwrite my edit. I don't know who downvoted and wish that person hadn't. Please don't feel disheartened. – Lee David Chung Lin Oct 13 '18 at 07:20
The bottom and top symbols $\bot,\,\top$ respectively denote contradictions and tautologies in model theory. For example, a proof by contradiction that $\sqrt{2}\notin\mathbb{Q}$ can be rewritten as a proof that $\sqrt{2}\in\mathbb{Q}\to\bot$.
- 118,053
The symbol is use came from my professors at Emory University and Auburn University (all Moore Method practitioners) which is octothorp bang, #!
I use it and teach my students to use it.
One that all of my professors back in my college days used was "X" with each stroke looking like an axe.
- 655
-
I don't know if it's the case, but I've seen people use strange/wrong/non-standard symbols in slides and or lecture notes just due to poor IT skills, lack of fonts in PowerPoint/printer, etc. – Andrestand Mar 11 '21 at 10:37
-
1
-
1@Andrestand Absolutely, I've seen a lot of improvised notations. I spent a long time trying to figure out what diagonal arrows on limits meant, just to find out my professor was feeling artsy that day. This stuff is impossible to look up, too. – John P Oct 08 '22 at 08:24
To indicate contradiction, I use either of the following three Arial Unicode MS letter-like symbols: Ⓡ or Ⓟ or Ⓒ. For me, Ⓡ indicates Reduction to Absurdity; review, revise, redo. (The 3 R's); Ⓟ indicates premise issue; Ⓒ indicates contradiction.
I got the initial idea from RPC meaning 'Remote Procedure Call' See How RPC Works at https:/technet.microsoft.com, The purpose is to call in your brain (Remote Procedure) to review, revise and redo the premises in your logical proofs or electronic designs. That's the real job.
In philosophy and mathematics, a proof by contradiction, shows the logical revision of a premise. Proof by Contradiction ● A proof by contradiction is a proof that works as follows: ● To prove that P is true, assume that P is not true. ● Based on the assumption that P is not true, conclude something impossible. ● Assuming the logic is sound, the only option is that the assumption that P is not true is incorrect. ● Conclude, therefore, that P is true.
Some Proofs by Contradiction: MATH DIY :here are many mathematical proofs by contradiction on the Internet,
RELIGION: Ponder Anselm's Argument for Existence of God at http://web.nmsu.edu/~dscoccia/101web/101ONT.pdf
P versus NP Problem: SEE Wikipedia at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P_versus_NP_problem
LEGAL: Discredit the opponent's argument by showing it is absurd. SEE: 'Recording and Proof of Contradictions and Omissions, Their Evidential Value and Appreciation of Evidence of Hostile Witnesses' at http://mja.gov.in/Site/Upload/GR/summary%20of%20second%20work%20shop%20criminal%20dated%2010-01-15.pdf.
- 11
I'm 8 years late, but I've seen that this answer is not on the list. In Romania we use a symbol similar to a pair of scissors, that I have learned from both my teachers I've studied with. Unfortunately, I was unable to find such a symbol in MathJax, but I will try reproducing it: $\require{HTML} \style{display: inline-block; transform: rotate(30deg) scaleX(-1)}{\flat} \style{display: inline-block; transform: rotate(-30deg) scaleX(1)}{\flat}$. Yes, something like that, but with smaller "ears".
- 1,088
-
-
There are several scissors symbols in the Comprehensive LaTeX symbols list https://www.ctan.org/pkg/comprehensive They can be rotated with the command
\rotatebox. – Andrestand Mar 11 '21 at 10:51
The symbols are:
$\top$ for truth (example: $100 \in \mathbb{R} \to \top$)
and $\bot$ for false (example: $\sqrt{2} \in \mathbb{Q} \to \bot$)
In Latex, \top is $\top$ and \bot is $\bot$.
- 1
-
As also mentioned... typical for tautology and always false, respectively, too. – Andrestand Mar 11 '21 at 10:40
-
What kind of arrow is that? "Implies" as in
!a || bwould mean both versions are reducible without needing to look ata. "Yields" as inF: X --> Ymight make sense, but I can't identifyF. "Maps" would be plausible, but like with "yields" it's describing a subject that isn't there, in this case the map. And if a consistent map or function did sendtrue --> trueit would just send that to true too, and so on. Sorry I'm slow today. – John P Oct 08 '22 at 08:08

#as a contradiction symbol. – Zev Chonoles Jun 19 '12 at 00:17?!. I found that quite amusing. – tskuzzy Jun 25 '12 at 16:46