8

As the question title suggests, is the tangent bundle of $S^2 \times S^1$ trivial or not?

Progress: I suspect yes. If I could construct three independent vector fields, I would be done. But I'm not so sure how to do that. Could anyone help?

  • 1
    To answer the question in your post: Yes. –  Dec 10 '15 at 19:05
  • See the answer in: http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/1567516/what-are-examples-of-parallelizable-complex-projective-varieties –  Dec 14 '15 at 08:28

3 Answers3

13

It's true, more generally, that any product of spheres has trivial tangent bundle, as long as (at least) one of them has odd dimension. To prove this requires some yoga with vector bundles.

However, yes, you can explicitly write down three linearly independent vector fields on $S^2\times S^1$. Here's a hint to get you started: For any vector $v\in\Bbb R^3$, consider its projection onto $T_pS^2$. Can you figure out how to assign a vector in $T_q S^1$?

Ted Shifrin
  • 125,228
  • Can other products of spheres have trivial tangent bundles? Say, $S^{2} \times S^{2}$? – Espace' etale Mar 16 '21 at 16:15
  • @Espace'etale: No. A necessary condition for the tangent bundle to be trivial is that the Euler characteristic be $0$. This happens only when one of the factors has odd dimension. – Ted Shifrin Mar 16 '21 at 17:33
  • I'm currently stuck on this question and I'm fairly new to these things. Can you please give me a better hint to work on? I'm having difficulties understanding how projecting a vector onto the tangentI'm currently stuck on this question and I'm fairly new to these things. Can you please give me a better hint to work on? I'm having difficulties understanding how projecting a vector onto the tangent space of a point p helps. which point is p? And how can that help me get three independent vector fields? – Soheil Haghighi Oct 18 '24 at 12:42
  • @SoheilHaghighi Tell me how projection of $v$ onto a plane works; what's the actual definition? For your second question, can you find three linearly independent vectors $v$? – Ted Shifrin Oct 18 '24 at 15:58
  • Thanks for answering. Well, I can propjet the vector on the normal vector of the plane and subtract the result from the vector(Here it will be: $v-\frac{v\cdot p}{p\cdot p}p=v-(v\cdot p)p$). But why shound I do this for any vector in $\mathbb{R}^3$? I think I'm really confused and I'm missing something. And I can't figure out how to get the 3 vectors ( I feel so dumb) – Soheil Haghighi Oct 19 '24 at 15:02
  • @SoheilHaghighi The point is that $v$ is uniquely the sum of a vector in the plane and a vector orthogonal to it. Turn the latter into a unique vector tangent to the circle at $q$. – Ted Shifrin Oct 19 '24 at 18:32
  • @TedShifrin, Thanks again. I thought this through and your hint definitely helped me understand how to find the three vector fields. – Soheil Haghighi Oct 23 '24 at 17:47
3

A more explicit answer: identify $S^2\times\mathbb{R}$ with $\mathbb{R}^3\setminus\{0\}$ by the diffeomorphism $\psi(x,t):=2^t x$ (here we think $x\in S^2\subset\mathbb{R}^3$) and identify $S^1$ with $\mathbb{R}/\mathbb{Z}$.

Calling $\delta:\mathbb{R}^3\setminus\{0\}\to\mathbb{R}^3\setminus\{0\}$ the dilation by a factor $2$, i.e. $\delta(x):=2x$, it suffices to find three independent vector fields $X_1,X_2,X_3$ on $\mathbb{R}^3\setminus\{0\}$ s.t. $$d\delta((X_i)_x)=(X_i)_{\delta(x)}\quad\quad(*)$$ (for $i=1,2,3$) because then you can define three independent vector fields $Y_1,Y_2,Y_3$ on $S^2\times S^1$ with the formula $$(Y_i)_{(x,[t])}:=d(\pi\circ\psi^{-1})((X_i)_{\psi(x,t)})$$ (here $\pi:S^2\times\mathbb{R}\to S^2\times S^1$ is the product of $\mathrm{id}_{S^2}$ by the standard projection $\mathbb{R}\to S^1$). Note that this is a good definition: calling $\tau:S^2\times\mathbb{R}$, $\tau(x,t):=(x,t+1)$, it suffices to check that $$ d(\pi\circ\psi^{-1})((X_i)_{\psi(x,t)})=d(\pi\circ\psi^{-1})((X_i)_{\psi\circ\tau(x,t)}). $$ But $\psi\circ\tau=\delta\circ\psi$, so you can rewrite the RHS as $$ d(\pi\circ\psi^{-1})((X_i)_{\psi\circ\tau(x,t)}) =d((\pi\circ\tau^{-1})\circ\psi^{-1})((X_i)_{\delta\circ\psi(x,t)}) \\ =d(\pi\circ(\psi\circ\tau)^{-1})\circ d\delta((X_i)_{\psi(x,t)}) =d(\pi\circ(\delta\circ\psi)^{-1}\circ\delta)((X_i)_{\psi(x,t)}) =LHS $$ thanks to $(*)$. Besides checking these computations, I strongly suggest that you draw a picture and understand what is going on.

Now we have to build the vector fields $X_1,X_2,X_3$ s.t. $(*)$ holds, but this is very easy: choose $(X_i)_x:=r(x)\frac{\partial}{\partial x^i}$ for $i=1,2,3$ (here $r:\mathbb{R}^3\setminus\{0\}\to\mathbb{R}$ is the distance from the origin).

Mizar
  • 6,061
  • 24
  • 50
1

Just a note on terminology. A manifold with trivial tangent bundle is called parallelizable, so your question can be rephrased as "Is $S^2\times S^1$ parallelizable?"

As has already been pointed out, the answer is yes. In fact, every closed orientable three-dimensional manifold is parallelizable. If you are trying to explicitly write down three linearly independent vector fields on such a manifold (e.g. $S^2\times S^1$), this fact (and its proof) will not help.

Another general result about parallelizable manifolds which includes $S^2\times S^1$ is the one mentioned in Ted Shifrin's answer: a (non-trivial) product of spheres is parallelizable if and only if at least one of the spheres is odd-dimensional. Again, the proof of this fact will not help you to construct any vector fields. However, there is a paper by Parton, Explicit parallelizations on products of spheres, which does exactly this. In particular, section $2$ deals with the case $S^m\times S^1$.

  • Note, while the paper I mentioned above constructs the vector fields explicitly, I think it is worthwhile to first try to follow the hint in Ted Shifrin's answer. In this low-dimensional setting, we have a chance to think geometrically, which (for me) gives a better understanding of what the vector fields in question actually are. – Michael Albanese Dec 19 '15 at 13:31