Whenever we are supposed to prove that a limit for a given function at a given point doesn't exist, using the $\epsilon-\delta$ criterion, we assume that the limit exists, show that for ONE value of $\epsilon$, we arrive at a contradiction, and thus prove that the limit does not exist.
I am having trouble choosing the value of $\epsilon$. Supposing we know that the graph is discontinuous at the given point, what should we look for to assume the value of $\epsilon$? Or is the value completely arbitrary? Or do we arrive at a contradiction for more than one values of $\epsilon$?
Just to make myself clear, here's an example:
$$f(x)=x\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;if\;x<1$$ $$\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;=3-x\;\;\;\;\;\; if\;x\ge1$$
To prove that the limit doesn't exist at $x=1$, the value of $\epsilon$ taken was $\frac12$. I won't go into the details of the solution, but we arrive at a contradiction as $1<1$.
How did we know that $\epsilon=\frac12$ would work?