5

Let $f:X\to Y$ be a continuous map, and let $M_f = (X\times I) \sqcup Y)/(x,0)\sim f(x)$ be its mapping cylinder. Then the inclusion $X\to M_f$ is a cofibration.

My attempt:

Using the following theorem from Bredon seems like the most promising route:

1.5. Theorem. Assume that $A \subset X$ is closed and that there exist a neighbourhood $U$ of $A$ and a map $\phi : X \to I$, such that:

  1. $A = \phi ^{-1} (0)$;
  2. $\phi (X \setminus U) = \{ 1 \}$;
  3. $U$ deforms to $A$ through $X$ with $A$ fixed. That is, there is a map $H : U \times I \to X$ such that $H(a,t) = a \ \forall a \in A$, $H(u,0) = u$, and $H(u,1) \in A \ \forall u \in U$.

Then the inclusion $A \hookrightarrow X$ is a cofibration. The converse also holds.

Let us define a map $$\phi: M_f \to I, \quad (x,t)\mapsto \min(1,2-2t);\,\, y\mapsto 1$$ Then $\phi^{-1}(0) = X \times \{1\}$. Let $U$ be the upper half of the mapping cylinder. Then $\phi(U^c) = \{1\}$. Also, $X\times \{1\}$ is a strong deformation retract of $U$ I think.

So, by the theorem, the inclusion $X\to M_f$ is a cofibration.

I'm not sure if I'm on the right track. Is there a better way to do this? Is my way correct?

Alex M.
  • 35,927
iwriteonbananas
  • 6,482
  • 1
    Thanks, can u help me understand why $X\times {1}$ is a strong deformation retract of $U$? It seems kinda obvious on the pictures I've been drawing, but I cant formulate a rigorous argument – iwriteonbananas Mar 20 '15 at 15:22
  • 2
    Actually nevermind, the map $$H:U\times I \to U \ ((x,s),t)\mapsto t(x,1) + (1-t)(x,s)$$ does the job – iwriteonbananas Mar 20 '15 at 15:54
  • 2
    Hey, that's the same map as in my answer. Well, not a surprise, as it's the most obvious function :-) – Stefan Hamcke Mar 20 '15 at 15:59

2 Answers2

2

As the OP was asking for it, here's a rigorous argument as to why $X\times\{1\}$ is a deformation retract of $U$.

The set $U$ is $X\times\left(\frac12,1\right]$, and its product topology makes it a subspace of $M_f$ since it is open and consists of entire equivalence classes. One possible map $U\times I\to M_f$ deforming $U$ onto $X\times\{1\}$ would be $$(x,s,t)\mapsto (x,t+(1-t)s)$$ as a map $U\times I\to X\times I\to M_f$ or, I you like, a map $U\times I\to U\hookrightarrow M_f$

Stefan Hamcke
  • 28,621
0

I'm not sure if it couldn't be shortened. Please, correct me if I'm wrong. All we have to show is that this inclusion allows us to extend homotopies. Sorry, I don't know how to draw diagrams; it would be easier, but it's late now.

So we have homotopy $F: X \to P(Y)$ (the cocylinder to $Y$) and $i: X \to Z(X)$ (the cylinder of $X$) together with $f: Z(X) \to Y$ and $p: P(Y) \to Y$ and want to construct $F': Z(X) --> P(Y)$ in such a way that the appropriate diagram would be commutative. But this is easy (I suppose), because $i$ is a homotopy equivalence, so we can take its inverse $j$ and take $F'=Fj$ and it would be fine. Right?

Take care!

Alex M.
  • 35,927
whereabouts
  • 199