7

Possible Duplicate:
What is a good text in intermediate set theory?

I need a good book about Set Theory. As I was searching online I came across "Set Theory - Kenneth Kunen" which seems to be one of the bests. Does anyone have any other suggestions? Should I be concerned about reading something which is written recently or old texts are also good?

Community
  • 1
DeveloperInToronto
  • 213
  • 1
  • 2
  • 7

1 Answers1

6

The best book I've seen on set theory for the serious student is Yiannis Moschovakis' Notes on Set Theory . Deep, broad and beautifully written with lots of good exercises. It's the book I wish I'd known about when I was taking Russell Miller's set theory course at CUNY. The old standby which I actually did use for the course is Herbert Enderton's Elements of Set Theory. This book is also beautifully written, but is deeper in a number of respects and Enderton is sometimes confusing since he isn't clear sometimes on the distinction between a set, it's subsets and it's elements. (To be honest, though, this is not so much a failing of Enderton's book, but of axiomatic set theory in general when it is presented in natural language rather then mathematical logical language. But that's the great chicken-or-the-egg debate of axiomatic set theory: logic first or no logic?) There's a few others,but those are my faves.

Rudy the Reindeer
  • 48,301
Mathemagician1234
  • 17,966
  • 2
    OK,I AM BEGINNING TO LOSE MY TEMPER WITH PEOPLE DOWNVOTING MY POSTS JUST FOR KICKS AND ANONYMOUSLY AT THAT.I'M FILING A COMPLAINT WITH THE MODERATORS. – Mathemagician1234 Apr 17 '12 at 18:24
  • 7
    I did not down-vote (I was just looking at some closed questions), but I would imagine that the reason someone down-voted may be one of the following: namedropping ("Russell Miller's set theory course at CUNY...") is not only irrelevant but also is not considered in good form; your answer begins to ramble a bit (you begin to criticize set theory in an answer, which is not really related to OP's question). Like I said, I don't have a huge problem with this stuff, but that's probably why someone down-voted. Also, I prefer Enderton over Moschovaski, but I'm not a huge fan of set theory. =] –  Apr 19 '12 at 16:25
  • 6
    @james Personal recollections are part of the humanity of mathematics. Paul Halmos' I WANT TO BE A MATHEMATICIAN burned that into my psyche for life. Mathematics isn't just about number,functions and symbols-it's about the humans you learned it from. – Mathemagician1234 May 04 '14 at 20:43