4

enter image description here

in these notes i am reading i am told that the socle of $K$ (where $K \subset M$ , and $M$ is a module) is = $K \cap$ Soc $ M$

But why is this? i see the intuition but cannot formalize a proof

any help would be great thanks

Stefan4024
  • 36,357
Peter A
  • 1,116

1 Answers1

3

There are two ways to see this.

First, one characterization of the socle of a module $N$ is that it is the sum of the simple submodules of $N$. The simple submodules of $K$ are exactly the simple submodules of $M$ that lie in $K$.

Second, using the theorem you stated in the comments let $f\colon K \to M$ be the inclusion map. Then that theorem gives $\mathrm{soc} \ K \subseteq \mathrm{soc} \ M$ and clearly it's in $K$ so $\mathrm{soc} \ K \subseteq K \cap \mathrm{soc} \ M$. But $K \cap \mathrm{soc} \ M$ is semisimple and a submodule of $K$ so $K \cap \mathrm{soc} \ M \subseteq \mathrm{soc} \ K$. Hence they are equal.

Jim
  • 31,547
  • ah of course, it makes sense thank you! – Peter A Nov 20 '14 at 19:25
  • Also, just out of interest is there any way i could use this fact to show that given $ 0 \longrightarrow M \longrightarrow N \longrightarrow P$ is exact, then $0 \longrightarrow soc(M) \longrightarrow soc(N) \longrightarrow soc(P)$ is exact ? – Peter A Nov 20 '14 at 19:50
  • Yes, this is how you show exactness at $\mathrm{soc} \ N$. Since the maps are restrictions the kernel of $\mathrm{soc} \ N \to \mathrm{soc} \ P$ is $\ker(N \to P) \cap \mathrm{soc} \ N$. – Jim Nov 20 '14 at 23:00