Confused AUC ROC score

Question

I am working on binary classification problem, I try to evaluate the performance of some classification algorithms (LR,Decission Tree , Random forest ...). I am using a cross validation technique (to avoid over-fitting) with AUC ROC as scoring function to compare the performance of the algorithms, but I am getting a weird results with Random forest and AdbBoost, I have a perfect AUC_ROC score (i.e. =1) despite the fact that the recall(TPR) and FPR of this algorithms are different from 1 and 0 respectively .

def FPR(y_true, y_pred):
    tn, fp, fn, tp = confusion_matrix(y_true, y_pred).ravel()
    result = fp / (fp+tn)
    return result
def FNR(y_true, y_pred):
    tn, fp, fn, tp = confusion_matrix(y_true, y_pred).ravel()
    result = fn / (tp+fn)
    return result
FPR_scorer = make_scorer(FPR)
FNR_scorer = make_scorer(FNR)
def get_CrossValResults2(model,cv_rst,bestIndx):
    best=pd.DataFrame.from_dict(cv_rst).iloc[bestIndx]
    roc="{:.12f}".format(best['mean_test_roc_auc'])
    acc ="{:.0%}".format(best['mean_test_accuracy'])
    prec ="{:.0%}".format(best['mean_test_precision'])
    rec ="{:.0%}".format( best['mean_test_recall'])
    f1 ="{:.0%}".format(best['mean_test_f1'])
    r2="{:.2f}".format(best['mean_test_r2'])
    g_mean="{:.2f}".format(best['mean_test_gmean'])
    pr_auc="{:.8f}".format(best['mean_test_pr'])
    fnr="{:.0%}".format(best['mean_test_fnr'])
    fpr="{:.0%}".format(best['mean_test_fpr'])
    rst = pd.DataFrame([[ model, acc,prec,rec,fpr,fnr,f1,roc,pr_auc,g_mean,r2]],columns = ['Model', 'Accuracy', 'Precision', 'Recall','FPR','FNR', 'F1-Score','ROC_auc','PR_auc','gmean','r2'])
    return rst
cross_val_rst = pd.DataFrame(columns = ['Model', 'Accuracy', 'Precision', 'Recall','FPR','FNR', 'F1-Score','ROC_auc','PR_auc','gmean','r2'])
scoring = {'accuracy':'accuracy','recall':'recall','precision':'precision','fpr':FPR_scorer,'fnr':FNR_scorer,'f1':'f1' ,'roc_auc':'roc_auc','pr':'average_precision','gmean':Gmean_scorer,'r2':'r2'}

param_grid = {'n_estimators': [200], 
             'max_depth': [80,90],
              'min_samples_leaf': [2,3, 4],
            'min_samples_split': [2,5,12],
            'criterion': [ 'gini'],
             'class_weight' : [class_weights], 'n_jobs' : [-1]} 
clf = GridSearchCV(RandomForestClassifier(class_weight=class_weights), param_grid, cv=kfold,scoring=scoring,refit=refit)#Fit the model
bestmodel = clf.fit(X,Y)
cross_val_rst = cross_val_rst.append(get_CrossValResults2(model='Random Forrest',bestIndx=bestmodel.best_index_,cv_rst=bestmodel.cv_results_),ignore_index=True)

score 1 · Accepted Answer · answered Aug 24 '20 at 14:44

Oh, I think I've finally got it. It's just an averaging problem: for each fold in your k-fold cross-validation, you get perfect auROC, but at the default threshold of 0.5 your hard classifiers (for each fold) sometimes have $FPR=0$ and $TPR<1$, but some other times $FPR>0$ and $TPR=1$. Then averaging you are able to get both $\operatorname{mean}(FPR)>0$ and $\operatorname{mean}(TPR)<1$.

To check, have a look at the cv_results_ table, particularly at each test fold scores (split<i>_test_<xyz>), rather than just the mean_test_<xyz> scores.

score 0 · Answer 2 · answered Jul 20 '20 at 15:14

I think recall and FPR are calculated in scikit-learn using a threshold of 0.5. On the other hand ROC AUC is transparent to model threshold. I encourage you to explore thresholder in scikit-lego to inspect in this direction.

An example of AUC = 1 but bad FPR would be if you use 0.5 as a threshold, you model splits your samples perfectly but the positive ones have scores between 0.2 and 0.4 and your negative ones have scores between 0 and 0.2.

Confused AUC ROC score

2 Answers2

Linked

Related