5

Recently I have been reading this paper by Dan Boneh et al., where the authors are going to use a general form of forking lemma, to prove the security of their Schnorr multi-signature.

As I understood, this general form of forking lemma is about having several crucial points, rather than a single point (by crucial I mean the point that we rewind the adversary).

When you go to the security proof (pp 21-22), what they are using is just rewinding to a single point.

So I was wondering what is the reason for using this general forking lemma?

A.Solei
  • 415
  • 2
  • 11

0 Answers0