Should sitemap index contain child sitemaps with .gz extension?

Question

Question: Is it required to have .gz extension for child sitemaps or not?

This is what I found:

Google provides the following sitemap index example:

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
   <sitemapindex xmlns="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9">
   <sitemap>
      <loc>http://www.example.com/sitemap1.xml.gz</loc>
      <lastmod>2004-10-01T18:23:17+00:00</lastmod>
   </sitemap>
   <sitemap>
      <loc>http://www.example.com/sitemap2.xml.gz</loc>
      <lastmod>2005-01-01</lastmod>
   </sitemap>
   </sitemapindex>

Very similar example can be found on sitemaps.org. As per sitemaps.org:

<loc> - Identifies the location of the Sitemap. This location can be a Sitemap, an Atom file, RSS file or a simple text file.

Both examples don't specify anything about .gz and I couldn't find any sitemap index example that doesn't contain .gz. However, all child sitemaps in my case are not gzipped and I'm wondering whether it's right way of doing it or not.

I would suggest asking a mod to migrate this to [Webmasters.SE](//webmasters.stackexchange.com), as you're more likely to get an answer over there — Machavity, Apr 25 '18 at 14:44
This question appears to be off-topic because it is not within the bounds of discussion as described in the help center. — , Apr 25 '18 at 16:43

score 3 · Accepted Answer · answered Apr 27 '18 at 09:20

3

No, gzipping the files is not necessary. From the Sitemaps.org Protocol:

If you would like, you may compress your Sitemap files using gzip to reduce your bandwidth requirement…

Google themselves reference uncompressed Sitemap files: https://www.google.com/sitemap.xml

answered Apr 27 '18 at 09:20

GDVS

438
2
10

Thank you for provided example! That gave me more confidence in my solution. – skryvets Apr 27 '18 at 17:40

Should sitemap index contain child sitemaps with .gz extension?

1 Answers1