Questions tagged [reductive-groups]

Reductive groups are almost semisimple, they have nice representation theory, and they are classified by root data. This class of groups is the natural setting of a wide variety of representation theoretic problems in algebraic geometry. Use this tag for questions about algebraic groups of types A, B, C, D, E, F, and G—for Lie groups of the same type use [lie-groups]. Consider using with the [group-theory] and/or [representation-theory] tags.

Reductive groups form a large class of linear algebraic groups interpolating between semisimple algebraic groups, like $\mathrm{SL}_n$, and multiplicative algebraic groups, like $\mathbb{G}_m$, and including the most important algebraic group of all, $\mathrm{GL}_n$.

There are many way of defining reductive groups. One could use:

  • the unipotent radical: An algebraic group $G$ is reductive if the largest normal unipotent subgroup $R_u(G)$ is trivial
  • representations: An algebraic group $G$ is reductive if its category of representations is semisimple.
  • group quotients: If $G$ is a linear algebraic group, then it has an embedding $G \hookrightarrow \mathrm{GL}_n$; if $\mathrm{GL}_n/G$ is an affine scheme, then $G$ is reductive.

Reductive groups can be studied analogously to semisimple Lie groups. If $T \subset G$ is a maximal split torus (meanining $T$ is the largest multiplicative subgroup of $G$ isomorphic to a cartesian product of $\mathbb{G}_m$), then the Lie algebra $\mathfrak{g}$ of $G$ decomposes into root spaces:

$$ \mathfrak{g} = \mathfrak{t} \oplus \bigoplus_{\alpha \in \Phi} \mathfrak{g}_{\alpha}, $$

where $\mathop{Lie}(T) = \mathfrak{t}$ acts on $\mathfrak{g}_{\alpha}$ via the root $\alpha$. Also, the irreducible representations of $G$ are highest-weight representations, classified by dominant weights, or morphisms $T \to \mathbb{G}_m$.

Furthermore, the classification of reductive groups is closely related to the classification of semisimple Lie algebras, with some slight complication. If $G$ is a simple reductive group defined over an algebraically closed field, then its root system $\Phi$ is a member of one of $4$ infinite families $A_n$, $B_n$, $C_n$, or $D_n$, or else is one of $5$ exceptional types $E_6$, $E_7$, $E_8$, $F_4$, or $G_2$—the exact same $7$ families for root systems of Lie algebras. The full classification of reductive groups also takes into account the lattices of coweights $X^{\vee} = \mathrm{Hom}(\mathbb{G}_m, T)$ and weights $X = \mathrm{Hom}(T, \mathbb{G}_m)$, forming a root datum $(X, \Phi, X^{\vee})$. For each possible root datum there is exactly one connected reductive group over a given algebraically closed field, up to isomorphism.

187 questions
36
votes
1 answer

What is reductive group intuitively?

I am studying Geometric invariant theory and wonder how I should understand linearly reductive algebraic group. We say that an affine algebraic group $G$ is linearly reductive if all finite dimensional $G$-modules are semi-simple. I am not sure if…
M. K.
  • 5,191
  • 2
  • 33
  • 55
11
votes
0 answers

Representation theory of the general linear group over a finite prime field

The irreducible modules of $\operatorname{GL}_n(\mathbb C)$ over $\mathbb C$ are completely classified and well-understood via Schur-Weyl duality, the algebraic Peter-Weyl theorem and the entire theory of reductive groups in characteristic zero. I…
10
votes
2 answers

How parabolic subgroups are determined by roots?

I am interested in understanding the general construction of important subgroups in reductive groups, and how they are parametrized (Borel, Levi, parabolic, etc.). But for simplicity I take the example of $SL(3)$ over a field $k$. There are six…
Lyer Lier
  • 385
7
votes
1 answer

Computing $\chi(1)$ and $\chi(s)$ for $\chi\in\widehat{\mathrm{GL}_2(\mathbb{F}_q)}$ and semisimple non-regular $s$ using formulas of Deligne-Lusztig

Let $G=\mathrm{GL}_2$ and $s=\left(\begin{smallmatrix} a & \\ & b \end{smallmatrix}\right)$ be semisimple and non-regular in $G(\mathbb{F}_q)=\mathrm{GL}_2(\mathbb{F}_q)$ (i.e. $a\neq b$ and $ab\neq 0$). In their 1976 paper, Deligne-Lusztig gave a…
7
votes
1 answer

Reductive group terminology questions

$\DeclareMathOperator{\Hom}{Hom}$ $\newcommand{\g}{\mathfrak{g}}$ I am a beginner in the subject of reductive groups and I am hoping someone might be able to walk me through some basic terminology. This is not homework so any and all remarks, even…
7
votes
0 answers

Are the Deligne-Lusztig varieties for $\mathrm{GL}$ and $\mathrm{SL}$ the same?

Let me first give some definitions for reference. Let $\mathbf G$ be a connected reductive group over an algebraic closure $\overline{\mathbb F}$ of a finite field $\mathbb F_p$, where $p$ is a prime number. Let $q$ be a power of $p$, and assume…
6
votes
1 answer

Parabolic induction of p-adic groups independent of the choice of parabolic.

I noticed many papers concerning the theory of smooth representations of connected reductive p-adic groups, omit the mention of the specific parabolic subgroup $P\subseteq G$ used in defining the parabolic induction functor $Ind^G_{P,M}$, and write…
6
votes
1 answer

Algebraic Peter-Weyl in positive characteristic

To my understanding there is an algebraic version of Peter-Weyl that holds in characteristic $0$ that says for any reductive group $G$ one has that: $$k[G]=\bigoplus V\otimes V^*$$ as a $G\times G$-representation, where the sum runs over all…
6
votes
2 answers

Representations of an algebraic group $G$ versus representations of the group $G(k)$

The following question stems from the discussion here. Let $G$ be a group scheme, $G$ acting on a vector space $V$ over a field $k$ is morphism of group valued functors $G \rightarrow GL_V$, where $GL_V$ is the functor on commutative $k$-algebras…
6
votes
0 answers

Irreducible admissible representation of a minimal parabolic is finite dimensional

Let $k$ be a nonarchimedean locally compact field, $G$ a connected reductive group over $k$ with minimal parabolic subgroup $P = MN$. Let $\sigma$ be a smooth representation of $M$. In chapter 3 of Casselman's notes on representation theory, he…
6
votes
1 answer

Lie algebras of reductive groups

Let $k$ be an algebraically closed field of positive characteristic and let $G$ be a connected split reductive group. We know $G$ is the product of its center $Z(G)$ and derived group $[G, G]$ and $[G, G]$ is semisimple so it's a product of simple…
5
votes
1 answer

Modular function of the unipotent radical of a parabolic subgroup of a reductive group

Let $G = \text{GL}_n(\mathbb{R})$. For a partition $\underline{n} = (n_1,\ldots,n_t)$ of $n$, let $P = P_{\underline{n}}$ denote the standard, block-upper-triangular parabolic subgroup of $G$ associated to $P_{\underline{n}}$. Let $U_P$ denote the…
5
votes
0 answers

Bernstein center

I am trying to read the lecture notes of Joseph Bernstein on the representations of $p$-adic groups and struggling to understand a certain claim regarding the Bernstein center. Suppose $G$ is a reductive $p$-adic group and $D$ is a cuspidal…
5
votes
1 answer

Proof of the measure decomposition $dg = dk \, d_lp$ using the Iwasawa decomposition for reductive groups

Let $G$ be (the rational points of) a connected, reductive group over a $p$-adic field $F$. Let $A$ be a maximal $F$-split torus of $G$, and $P$ a minimal parabolic subgroup containing $A$. Let $M = Z(A)$ be the centralizer of $A$ in $G$, and…
5
votes
1 answer

Is the center of a quasi-split reductive group diagonalizable?

I am trying to read a paper by Bin Xu, "On a lifting problem of $L$-packets", but I am stuck on a detail in the first page. The setting is: we have a local field $F$ of characteristic zero, and $G$ is an (affine) quasi-split connected reductive…
1
2 3
12 13